Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Black Jack Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 29189210808 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 3,319 · 66% of tract blocks fall in Black Jack

Census tract 29189210808 runs through Black Jack. With 3,319 residents, it scores 6.1/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #18,958 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Average household income is about $94,107 a year. About 0% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 60% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 0% Owners 100%
Tract context
Occupied units1,119
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate19.2%
Median income$94,107

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Black Jack
Moderate
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#69 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Elevated
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#887 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Moderate
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Black Jack and the region

Centroid at 38.8135, -90.2701 · click any tract to drill in

Why Black Jack scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Black Jack
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
19.2% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Black Jack
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Black Jack
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Black Jack
7.5

How Black Jack compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Black Jack risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 210808Black Jack: 3.03.0Black Jackparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 67

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 136Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.87×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Black Jack

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Black Jack, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 67th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189210808

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189210808?

Census tract 29189210808 in Black Jack scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189210808?

19.2% of residents in tract 29189210808 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,319.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189210808?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 89th, minority 89th, housing 12th.
Q4

Did eviction filings in tract 29189210808 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q5

What share of households in tract 29189210808 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 29189210808 compare to Black Jack overall?

Tract 29189210808 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Black Jack at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Black Jack; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Black Jack

Top eight tracts in Black Jack ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related