Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Bel-Ridge Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 29189213600 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 4,070 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Bel-Ridge

Tract 29189213600, home to 4,070 residents in Bel-Ridge in St. Louis County, scores 6.8/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 92nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

61% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $877 monthly, set against $35,697 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 68% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 27% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,600
Renter share68.3%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate20.5%
Median income$35,697

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bel-Ridge
Moderate
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#23 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Very High
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#306 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
High
National
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#23,554 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bel-Ridge and the region

Centroid at 38.7135, -90.3277 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bel-Ridge scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bel-Ridge
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
20.5% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$877 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bel-Ridge
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bel-Ridge
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bel-Ridge
8.0

How Bel-Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bel-Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 213600Bel-Ridge: 3.23.2Bel-Ridgeparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,170Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 14.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.4%Peak (2017)
  • 189Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892136002003: 128 filings (13.07/100 renter HHs)2004: 121 filings (12.36/100 renter HHs)2005: 151 filings (13.75/100 renter HHs)2006: 182 filings (16.58/100 renter HHs)2010: 132 filings (12.31/100 renter HHs)2012: 139 filings (13.67/100 renter HHs)2013: 128 filings (12.59/100 renter HHs)2017: 189 filings (18.35/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 48% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 999Total filings 2020-21
  • 13.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 9.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.31×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2020-02-01: 11 filings (2.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 12 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-11-01: 24 filings (2.82× baseline)2020-12-01: 8 filings (0.76× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-07-01: 7 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-10-01: 9 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-01-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-04-01: 39 filings (5.20× baseline)2022-05-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-09-01: 11 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-10-01: 28 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-12-01: 16 filings (1.52× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-02-01: 12 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 28 filings (2.55× baseline)2023-04-01: 14 filings (1.87× baseline)2023-05-01: 39 filings (5.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 21 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-07-01: 15 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-08-01: 15 filings (1.15× baseline)2023-09-01: 20 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 20 filings (1.90× baseline)2023-11-01: 16 filings (1.88× baseline)2023-12-01: 15 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2024-03-01: 23 filings (2.09× baseline)2024-04-01: 22 filings (2.93× baseline)2024-05-01: 18 filings (2.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-07-01: 15 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-08-01: 29 filings (2.23× baseline)2024-09-01: 18 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-10-01: 21 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 24 filings (2.82× baseline)2024-12-01: 18 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-01-01: 24 filings (2.82× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (3.25× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-04-01: 16 filings (2.13× baseline)2025-05-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (0.52× baseline)2025-07-01: 21 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-08-01: 19 filings (1.46× baseline)2025-09-01: 20 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 19 filings (1.81× baseline)2025-11-01: 11 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 24 filings (2.29× baseline)2026-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bel-Ridge

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bel-Ridge, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.31x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,170 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 14.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.4% of renter households in 2017.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189213600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189213600?

Census tract 29189213600 in Bel-Ridge scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189213600?

Median gross rent is $877/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189213600?

20.5% of residents in tract 29189213600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,070.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189213600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 95th, minority 86th, housing 95th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189213600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,170 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189213600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.09% of renter households, peaking at 18.4% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29189213600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.31× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29189213600 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 27.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29189213600 compare to Bel-Ridge overall?

Tract 29189213600 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Bel-Ridge at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bel-Ridge; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 29189213600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related