Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Ellendale Eviction Risk: Lower , Maplewood

Tract 29189216900 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 2,190 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 29189216900 belongs to Ellendale in Maplewood, Missouri. It is home to 2,190 residents and scores 5.2/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 46th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $858 monthly, set against $47,464 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 67% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 47% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,321
Renter share66.7%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$47,464

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Ellendale
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Maplewood
Very High
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#66 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Elevated
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#887 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Maplewood and the region

Centroid at 38.6168, -90.3167 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ellendale scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Maplewood
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$858 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Maplewood
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Maplewood
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Maplewood
4.1

How Ellendale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ellendale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 216900Maplewood: 2.32.3Maplewoodparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 382Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 5.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.5%Peak (2006)
  • 17Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892169002003: 64 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2004: 60 filings (6.84/100 renter HHs)2005: 72 filings (8.04/100 renter HHs)2006: 85 filings (9.50/100 renter HHs)2010: 28 filings (3.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 33 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2017: 17 filings (1.98/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 73% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 116Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.77×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (16.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ellendale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ellendale

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Maplewood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.77x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189216900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189216900?

Census tract 29189216900 in the Ellendale neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189216900?

Median gross rent is $858/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189216900?

9.9% of residents in tract 29189216900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,190.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189216900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 6th, minority 49th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 29189216900 considered part of Ellendale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29189216900 fall within Ellendale (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189216900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 382 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189216900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.28% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29189216900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.77× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29189216900 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29189216900 compare to Maplewood overall?

Tract 29189216900 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Maplewood at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Maplewood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29189216900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Maplewood

Top eight tracts in Maplewood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related