Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Wells Goodfellow Eviction Risk: Elevated , St. Louis

Tract 29510106200 · St. Louis city, MO · pop 1,658 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

The Wells Goodfellow neighborhood of St. Louis anchors census tract 29510106200, which lands at 6.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #11,063 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 47% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $835 a month while the average household earns $23,421 a year, roughly 43% of income at the averages. Renters make up 77% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 41% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units604
Renter share77.0%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate70.7%
Median income$23,421

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Wells Goodfellow
Very High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 104 tracts In St. Louis
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 104 tracts In St. Louis city
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Louis and the region

Centroid at 38.6803, -90.2781 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wells Goodfellow scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Louis
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.3
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
70.7% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$835 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Louis
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Louis
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Louis
5.0

How Wells Goodfellow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wells Goodfellow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 106200St. Louis: 3.33.3St. Louisparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 467Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 8.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.9%Peak (2008)
  • 29Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 295101062002004: 31 filings (5.78/100 renter HHs)2005: 34 filings (7.49/100 renter HHs)2006: 45 filings (9.91/100 renter HHs)2007: 46 filings (10.13/100 renter HHs)2008: 54 filings (11.89/100 renter HHs)2009: 27 filings (5.95/100 renter HHs)2010: 28 filings (7.47/100 renter HHs)2011: 31 filings (7.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 39 filings (9.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 33 filings (8.31/100 renter HHs)2015: 25 filings (6.30/100 renter HHs)2016: 45 filings (13.51/100 renter HHs)2017: 29 filings (8.71/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 88Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.39×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Wells Goodfellow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wells Goodfellow

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Louis City County average of 5.8 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.39x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 29510106200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29510106200?

Census tract 29510106200 in the Wells Goodfellow neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29510106200?

Median gross rent is $835/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29510106200?

70.7% of residents in tract 29510106200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,658.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29510106200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 77th, minority 97th, housing 77th.
Q5

Is tract 29510106200 considered part of Wells Goodfellow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29510106200 fall within Wells Goodfellow (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29510106200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 467 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 29510106200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.70% of renter households, peaking at 11.9% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29510106200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.39× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29510106200 struggle to pay rent?

About 46.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 44.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29510106200 compare to St. Louis overall?

Tract 29510106200 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of St. Louis at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29510106200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Louis

Top eight tracts in St. Louis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related