Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Wadsworth Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls

Tract 30013001700 · Cascade County, MT · pop 2,094 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 2.7/10, tract 30013001700 in the Wadsworth Park neighborhood of Great Falls ranks in the Lower tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,094 residents. It lands near the 1st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 15% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,034 a month against an average household income of $64,934 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 15% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units861
Renter share17.5%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$64,934

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Wadsworth Park
Moderate
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#15 of 19 tracts In Great Falls
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 25 tracts In Cascade County
Low
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#164 of 319 tracts In Montana
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Falls and the region

Centroid at 47.5097, -111.3626 · click any tract to drill in

Why Wadsworth Park scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,034 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0

How Wadsworth Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Wadsworth Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 001700Great Falls: 2.12.1Great Fallsparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Wadsworth Park

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 3.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cascade County average of 3.8 and below the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 30013001700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013001700?

Census tract 30013001700 in the Wadsworth Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30013001700?

Median gross rent is $1,034/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30013001700?

5.4% of residents in tract 30013001700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,094.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30013001700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 27th, minority 26th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 30013001700 considered part of Wadsworth Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30013001700 fall within Wadsworth Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30013001700 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30013001700 compare to Great Falls overall?

Tract 30013001700 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Great Falls at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls

Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related