Within neighborhood
43
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Radburn Eviction Risk: Lower , Fair Lawn
Tract 34003017302 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 2,899 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
How risky is Radburn in Fair Lawn for landlords? Census tract 34003017302 scores 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 77th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,250 monthly, set against $151,395 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 2% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units1,045
Renter share2.1%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$151,395
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
29
th percentile
Low
Within county
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
36
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fair Lawn and the region
Centroid at 40.9302, -74.1268 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radburn scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fair Lawn
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,250 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fair Lawn
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fair Lawn
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fair Lawn
6.0
How Radburn compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 16%Socioeconomic
- 25%Household composition
- 37%Racial/ethnic minority
- 49%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 3%Grade B
- 78%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radburn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 4.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 7.9%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 20.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Radburn
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fair Lawn eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bergen County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003017302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003017302?
Census tract 34003017302 in the Radburn neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34003017302?
Median gross rent is $2,250/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003017302?
3.6% of residents in tract 34003017302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,899.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003017302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 25th, minority 37th, housing 49th.
Q5
Is tract 34003017302 considered part of Radburn?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003017302 fall within Radburn (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 34003017302 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34003017302 compare to Fair Lawn overall?
Tract 34003017302 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Fair Lawn at 7.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fair Lawn eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34003017302 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fair Lawn
Top eight tracts in Fair Lawn ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related