Radburn Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fair Lawn
Tract 34003017400 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 5,894 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 34003017400 covers part of the Radburn area of Fair Lawn, NJ, and scores 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,894 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Fair Lawn and the region
Centroid at 40.9355, -74.1027 · click any tract to drill in
Why Radburn scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Radburn compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 50%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 6%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 34Total filings over 5 yrs
- 4.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.6%Peak (2018)
- 14Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Radburn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.8%Food insecurity
- 3.4%SNAP enrollment
- 4.1%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Radburn
Severe burden reaches 25%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
Cost burden runs 56% here against 46.6% across Bergen County. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.
Food insecurity runs 6.8% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 1.0 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 34 filings here across 5 tracked years. Housing insecurity runs 6.7% against 14.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2018, when 6.6% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 67th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $177,245, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34003017400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003017400?
What is the average rent in tract 34003017400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003017400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003017400?
Is tract 34003017400 considered part of Radburn?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003017400?
What share of households in tract 34003017400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003017400 compare to Fair Lawn overall?
Was tract 34003017400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Fair Lawn
Top eight tracts in Fair Lawn ranked by composite eviction-risk score.