Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Garfield Eviction Risk: High

Tract 34003021101 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,997

Census tract 34003021101 covers part of Garfield, NJ, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,997. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 27% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,480
Renter share54.9%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$74,219

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Garfield
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#15 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Very High
Within state
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#297 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
National
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#5,730 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Garfield and the region

Centroid at 40.8893, -74.1093 · click any tract to drill in

Why Garfield scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Garfield
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,548 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Garfield
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Garfield
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Garfield
6.7

How Garfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Garfield risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.4This tracttract 0211017.0Garfieldparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Garfield

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10. It sits 2.1 points above the Bergen County average of 6.3.

On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.5/10.

Against Bergen County at 46.6%, 51% of renters here are cost-burdened. Average gross rent is $1,548, 8% below the Garfield average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $74,219.

55% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003021101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003021101?

Census tract 34003021101 in Garfield scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003021101?

Median gross rent is $1,548/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003021101?

12.4% of residents in tract 34003021101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,997.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003021101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 59th, minority 64th, housing 68th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 34003021101 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34003021101 compare to Garfield overall?

Tract 34003021101 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Garfield at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Garfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 34003021101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Garfield

Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related