Within neighborhood
85
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally
Garfield Park Eviction Risk: High
Tract 34003030300 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 4,739 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 34003030300 covers part of the Garfield Park area of Lodi, NJ, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,739. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10.
Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,680
Renter share52.4%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate13.4%
Median income$86,736
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
95
th percentile
Very High
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Garfield and the region
Centroid at 40.8765, -74.0853 · click any tract to drill in
Why Garfield Park scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Garfield
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.4% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,618 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Garfield
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Garfield
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Garfield
6.9
How Garfield Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 77%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 80%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 279Total filings over 5 yrs
- 6.81%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.3%Peak (2013)
- 47Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Garfield Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.3%Housing insecurity
- 8.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.3%Food insecurity
- 10.7%SNAP enrollment
- 9.1%Transit barriers
- 16.3%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Garfield Park
Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. It sits 2.1 points above the Bergen County average of 6.3. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.8/10. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 279 filings here across 5 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 10.3% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.9/10. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003030300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003030300?
Census tract 34003030300 in the Garfield Park neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34003030300?
Median gross rent is $1,618/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003030300?
13.4% of residents in tract 34003030300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,739.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003030300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 77th, minority 75th, housing 89th.
Q5
Is tract 34003030300 considered part of Garfield Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003030300 fall within Garfield Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003030300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 279 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34003030300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.81% of renter households, peaking at 10.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34003030300 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34003030300 compare to Garfield overall?
Tract 34003030300 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Garfield at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Garfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34003030300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 80% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Garfield
Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related