Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Colonial Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Englewood

Tract 34003054102 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,474 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

34003054102 is a census tract in the Colonial Village area of Bergen County, NJ. It scores 5.3/10 for landlords. 12% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Bergen County average of 46.6%.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 7% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,218
Renter share7.8%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate0.2%
Median income$128,056

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Colonial Village
Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#145 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Low
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,234 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
National
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#28,095 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Englewood and the region

Centroid at 40.8862, -73.9978 · click any tract to drill in

Why Colonial Village scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Englewood
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Englewood
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Englewood
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Englewood
5.0

How Colonial Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Colonial Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.3This tracttract 0541026.9Englewoodparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Colonial Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Colonial Village

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.0 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #28,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 2.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. Poverty sits at 0%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003054102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003054102?

Census tract 34003054102 in the Colonial Village neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003054102?

0.2% of residents in tract 34003054102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,474.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003054102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 22th, minority 70th, housing 46th.
Q4

Is tract 34003054102 considered part of Colonial Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003054102 fall within Colonial Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 34003054102 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34003054102 compare to Englewood overall?

Tract 34003054102 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Englewood at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Englewood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 34003054102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related