Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Colonial Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Englewood

Tract 34003054102 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,474 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

How risky is Colonial Village in Englewood for landlords? Census tract 34003054102 scores 5.1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

12% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $128,056 a year. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 7% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,218
Renter share7.8%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate0.2%
Median income$128,056

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Colonial Village
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#127 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,543 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#65,113 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Englewood and the region

Centroid at 40.8862, -73.9978 · click any tract to drill in

Why Colonial Village scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Englewood
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Englewood
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Englewood
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Englewood
5.0

How Colonial Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Colonial Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 054102Englewood: 7.87.8Englewoodparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Colonial Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Colonial Village

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Englewood eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Bergen County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003054102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003054102?

Census tract 34003054102 in the Colonial Village neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003054102?

0.2% of residents in tract 34003054102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,474.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003054102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 22th, minority 70th, housing 46th.
Q4

Is tract 34003054102 considered part of Colonial Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003054102 fall within Colonial Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 34003054102 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34003054102 compare to Englewood overall?

Tract 34003054102 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Englewood at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Englewood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 34003054102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related