Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Greenhills Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Forest Park

Tract 39061021504 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,436 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 39061021504 runs through the Greenhills Historic District neighborhood of Forest Park. With 6,436 residents, it scores 5.4/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #40,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,185 a month against an average household income of $79,253 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 21% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,601
Renter share32.8%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$79,253

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Greenhills Historic District
Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Forest Park
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#148 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#2,004 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 39.2697, -84.4988 · click any tract to drill in

Why Greenhills Historic District scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,185 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
5.1

How Greenhills Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Greenhills Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 021504Forest Park: 2.52.5Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,516Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 11.49%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.3%Peak (2010)
  • 24Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610215042002: 73 filings (9.62/100 renter HHs)2003: 70 filings (9.22/100 renter HHs)2004: 78 filings (10.28/100 renter HHs)2005: 93 filings (12.79/100 renter HHs)2006: 89 filings (12.24/100 renter HHs)2007: 97 filings (13.34/100 renter HHs)2008: 114 filings (15.68/100 renter HHs)2009: 125 filings (17.19/100 renter HHs)2010: 147 filings (17.33/100 renter HHs)2011: 125 filings (12.58/100 renter HHs)2012: 100 filings (10.06/100 renter HHs)2013: 109 filings (10.97/100 renter HHs)2014: 100 filings (10.06/100 renter HHs)2015: 112 filings (11.27/100 renter HHs)2016: 60 filings (7.98/100 renter HHs)2018: 24 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 67% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 355Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (0.82× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (0.51× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (0.87× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (0.76× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.51× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (1.06× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (0.70× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (1.30× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.46× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (0.85× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (1.06× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.58× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-11-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (0.70× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (0.58× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-11-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Greenhills Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Greenhills Historic District

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,516 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 11.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.3% of renter households in 2010.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.61x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061021504

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061021504?

Census tract 39061021504 in the Greenhills Historic District neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061021504?

Median gross rent is $1,185/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061021504?

9.4% of residents in tract 39061021504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,436.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061021504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 87th, minority 78th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 39061021504 considered part of Greenhills Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061021504 fall within Greenhills Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061021504?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,516 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061021504 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.49% of renter households, peaking at 17.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061021504 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061021504 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061021504 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 39061021504 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related