Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Greenhills Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 39061021505 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,719 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 39061021505, home to 3,719 residents in Greenhills Historic District in Forest Park, scores 6.1/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 77% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,396 a month against an average household income of $50,833 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 24% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,428
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate18.7%
Median income$50,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Greenhills Historic District
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Forest Park
Very High
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#98 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#1,211 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 39.2829, -84.5134 · click any tract to drill in

Why Greenhills Historic District scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
18.7% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,396 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
5.1

How Greenhills Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Greenhills Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 021505Forest Park: 2.52.5Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 537Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 9.27%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.5%Peak (2016)
  • 34Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610215052002: 17 filings (4.99/100 renter HHs)2003: 38 filings (11.14/100 renter HHs)2004: 32 filings (9.38/100 renter HHs)2005: 25 filings (7.10/100 renter HHs)2006: 28 filings (7.95/100 renter HHs)2007: 41 filings (11.65/100 renter HHs)2008: 34 filings (9.66/100 renter HHs)2009: 29 filings (8.24/100 renter HHs)2010: 29 filings (7.84/100 renter HHs)2011: 19 filings (4.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 33 filings (8.09/100 renter HHs)2013: 35 filings (8.58/100 renter HHs)2014: 45 filings (11.03/100 renter HHs)2015: 41 filings (10.05/100 renter HHs)2016: 57 filings (17.48/100 renter HHs)2018: 34 filings (10.43/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 100% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 154Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.62×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (1.82× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (1.19× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.92× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (1.54× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Greenhills Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Greenhills Historic District

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 537 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 9.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.5% of renter households in 2016.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 75th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061021505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061021505?

Census tract 39061021505 in the Greenhills Historic District neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061021505?

Median gross rent is $1,396/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061021505?

18.7% of residents in tract 39061021505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,719.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061021505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 96th, minority 84th, housing 44th.
Q5

Is tract 39061021505 considered part of Greenhills Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061021505 fall within Greenhills Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061021505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 537 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061021505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.27% of renter households, peaking at 17.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061021505 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.62× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061021505 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061021505 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 39061021505 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related