Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Lincolnshire Eviction Risk: Lower , Toledo
Tract 39095007700 · Lucas County, OH · pop 3,220 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 39095007700 sits in the Lincolnshire area of Toledo eviction risk, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.2/10. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.9/10.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,521
Renter share39.6%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$70,691
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
11
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
34
th percentile
Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Toledo and the region
Centroid at 41.6812, -83.6329 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lincolnshire scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Toledo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$932 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Toledo
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Toledo
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Toledo
4.0
How Lincolnshire compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 39%Socioeconomic
- 83%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 3%Grade A
- 9%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 145Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.55%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.3%Peak (2011)
- 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 70% over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.5%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.4%Food insecurity
- 7.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 31.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lincolnshire
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Cost burden runs 31% here against 41.3% across Lucas County.
Running cool, economic stress reads 2.1/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 1.0 points below the Lucas County average of 4.2.
The filing record is not thin: 145 evictions over 15 years of observation. Food insecurity runs 9.4% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2011, when 2.3% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.5% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 39095007700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39095007700?
Census tract 39095007700 in the Lincolnshire neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39095007700?
Median gross rent is $932/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39095007700?
8.3% of residents in tract 39095007700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,220.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39095007700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 83th, minority 32th, housing 55th.
Q5
Is tract 39095007700 considered part of Lincolnshire?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39095007700 fall within Lincolnshire (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39095007700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 145 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39095007700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.55% of renter households, peaking at 2.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39095007700 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39095007700 compare to Toledo overall?
Tract 39095007700 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Toledo at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Toledo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39095007700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Toledo
Top eight tracts in Toledo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
Saint Peter and Saint Paul Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Saint Peter and Saint Paul Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Northlawn
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Bancroft Hills
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
United
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Northlawn
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Westmoreland
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Roosevelt
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related
Explore the geography around tract 39095007700
Parent city ↑
Toledo
4 / 10
Parent county ↑
Lucas County
Parent state ↑
Ohio
Sibling tract →
Saint Peter and Saint Paul Historic District
5.4 / 10
Sibling tract →
Saint Peter and Saint Paul Historic District
5.4 / 10
Sibling tract →
Northlawn
5.4 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts