Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally

Arleta Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland

Tract 41051000601 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 5,577 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

For landlords sizing up Arleta in Portland, census tract 41051000601 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 7.3/10. It lands near the 97th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

59% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,506 a month against an average household income of $73,239 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 12% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units2,228
Renter share28.9%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate19.8%
Median income$73,239

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Arleta
High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#30 of 168 tracts In Portland
High
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#37 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#93 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.4848, -122.5666 · click any tract to drill in

Why Arleta scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
19.8% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,506 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Arleta compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Arleta risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 000601Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 843Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 7.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.8%Peak (2007)
  • 37Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510006012000: 45 filings (7.20/100 renter HHs)2001: 35 filings (5.60/100 renter HHs)2002: 44 filings (7.04/100 renter HHs)2003: 53 filings (8.48/100 renter HHs)2004: 76 filings (12.16/100 renter HHs)2005: 68 filings (10.32/100 renter HHs)2006: 60 filings (9.10/100 renter HHs)2007: 78 filings (11.84/100 renter HHs)2008: 54 filings (8.19/100 renter HHs)2009: 49 filings (7.44/100 renter HHs)2010: 52 filings (7.07/100 renter HHs)2012: 61 filings (6.80/100 renter HHs)2013: 39 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2014: 31 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)2015: 61 filings (6.80/100 renter HHs)2016: 37 filings (4.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 273Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.99×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 13 filings (13.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 11 filings (11.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2025-09-01: 11 filings (1.83× baseline)2025-10-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (8.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Arleta. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Arleta

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.99x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051000601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051000601?

Census tract 41051000601 in the Arleta neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051000601?

Median gross rent is $1,506/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051000601?

19.8% of residents in tract 41051000601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,577.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051000601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 66th, minority 57th, housing 36th.
Q5

Is tract 41051000601 considered part of Arleta?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051000601 fall within Arleta (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051000601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 843 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051000601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.51% of renter households, peaking at 11.8% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051000601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.99× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051000601 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051000601 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 41051000601 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related