Tract 41051001101 ·
Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,994 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
For landlords sizing up the Ladd's Addition area of Portland, census tract 41051001101 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 7.2/10. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,425 monthly, set against $56,101 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 93% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43%Stable renters 51%Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units2,143
Renter share93.3%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate21.3%
Median income$56,101
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In Ladd's Addition
Very High
Within parent city
89th percentile
#20 of 168 tracts In Portland
High
Within county
90th percentile
#20 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Very High
Within state
93th percentile
#67 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.5133, -122.6613 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ladd's Addition scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
21.3% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,425 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Ladd's Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
60%Socioeconomic
2%Household composition
42%Racial/ethnic minority
93%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
12%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
799Total filings over 16 yrs
4.40%Avg annual filing rate
10.3%Peak (2001)
35Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Filings dropped 45% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
400Total filings 2020-21
5.2Avg monthly (observed)
3.0Pre-pandemic baseline
1.74×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ladd's Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 799 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 4.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.3% of renter households in 2001.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051001101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001101?
Census tract 41051001101 in the Ladd's Addition neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051001101?
Median gross rent is $1,425/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001101?
21.3% of residents in tract 41051001101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,994.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 2th, minority 42th, housing 93th.
Q5
Is tract 41051001101 considered part of Ladd's Addition?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001101 fall within Ladd's Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051001101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 799 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051001101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.40% of renter households, peaking at 10.3% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051001101 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.74× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051001101 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051001101 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051001101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.