Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Rosebank Eviction Risk: Lower , Nashville

Tract 47037011600 · Davidson County, TN · pop 5,155 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 47037011600 covers part of the Rosebank area of Nashville, TN, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,155. At $2,204 a month, rents run 39% over what the rest of Nashville commands.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 13% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,309
Renter share21.0%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$105,264

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Rosebank
Very High
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#129 of 166 tracts In Nashville
Low
Within county
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#163 of 174 tracts In Davidson County
Very Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#1,176 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Nashville and the region

Centroid at 36.1835, -86.7119 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosebank scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Nashville
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,204 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Nashville
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Nashville
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Nashville
3.1

How Rosebank compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosebank risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0116003.8Nashvilleparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 72Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Nashville, TN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rosebank. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosebank

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.7/10.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10. The voucher gap is 20.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 40% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Davidson County average of 46.0%.

It sits 0.9 points below the Davidson County average of 3.9. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $105,264.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 47037011600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47037011600?

Census tract 47037011600 in the Rosebank neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47037011600?

Median gross rent is $2,204/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47037011600?

1.5% of residents in tract 47037011600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,155.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47037011600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 1th, minority 34th, housing 12th.
Q5

Is tract 47037011600 considered part of Rosebank?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47037011600 fall within Rosebank (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 47037011600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Nashville eviction risk, TN), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 47037011600 compare to Nashville overall?

Tract 47037011600 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Nashville at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Nashville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 47037011600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Nashville

Top eight tracts in Nashville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related