Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Giants of the Savana Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas
Tract 48113005500 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,182 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
48113005500 is a census tract in the Giants of the Savana area of Dallas, TX. It scores 3.6/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,182. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 17%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,283
Renter share28.8%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$64,893
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
41
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
51
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
51
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Dallas and the region
Centroid at 32.7252, -96.7995 · click any tract to drill in
Why Giants of the Savana scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,102 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0
How Giants of the Savana compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 97
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 90%Socioeconomic
- 99%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 18%Grade B
- 75%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 972Total filings over 18 yrs
- 11.34%Avg annual filing rate
- 16.4%Peak (2003)
- 39Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 51% over the past 18 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 231Total filings 2020-21
- 3.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 3.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.90×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Giants of the Savana
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 26.6% against 11.3% nationally.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,102, 25% below the Dallas average.
40% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Dallas County average of 47.9%. The severe-burden share is 15%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 972 filings here across 18 tracked years.
Filings peaked in 2003 at 16.4% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 11.3% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 48113005500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113005500?
Census tract 48113005500 in the Giants of the Savana neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48113005500?
Median gross rent is $1,102/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48113005500?
9.5% of residents in tract 48113005500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,182.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48113005500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 99th, minority 96th, housing 82th.
Q5
Is tract 48113005500 considered part of Giants of the Savana?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113005500 fall within Giants of the Savana (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113005500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 972 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113005500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.34% of renter households, peaking at 16.4% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 48113005500 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.90× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 48113005500 compare to Dallas overall?
Tract 48113005500 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 48113005500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Dallas
Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · TX
Swiss Avenue Historic District
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Fair Park
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48113019212
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48121021637
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48113006701
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48113013629
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48113012302
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Prestondale
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Related