Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

The Greene Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113016513 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,908 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is the The Greene area of Dallas for landlords? Census tract 48113016513 scores 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 76% of renter households, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,549 monthly, set against $149,831 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 2% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,968
Renter share8.3%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$149,831

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In The Greene
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 11 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#627 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within state
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#6,384 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.6353, -96.9335 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Greene scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,549 rent vs county FMR
8.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
7.1

How The Greene compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Greene risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 016513Dallas: 2.72.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 427Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 21.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 40.8%Peak (2008)
  • 30Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130165132000: 19 filings (21.11/100 renter HHs)2001: 16 filings (17.78/100 renter HHs)2002: 21 filings (23.33/100 renter HHs)2003: 14 filings (15.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 17 filings (18.89/100 renter HHs)2005: 25 filings (25.51/100 renter HHs)2006: 33 filings (33.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 34 filings (34.69/100 renter HHs)2008: 40 filings (40.82/100 renter HHs)2009: 16 filings (16.33/100 renter HHs)2010: 27 filings (21.77/100 renter HHs)2011: 30 filings (21.28/100 renter HHs)2012: 24 filings (17.02/100 renter HHs)2013: 29 filings (20.57/100 renter HHs)2014: 22 filings (15.60/100 renter HHs)2015: 13 filings (9.22/100 renter HHs)2016: 17 filings (14.29/100 renter HHs)2017: 30 filings (25.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 58% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 173Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.01×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (7.46× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (6.02× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (6.77× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Greene. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Greene

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dallas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.01x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113016513

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113016513?

Census tract 48113016513 in the The Greene neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113016513?

Median gross rent is $2,549/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113016513?

4.9% of residents in tract 48113016513 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,908.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113016513?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 63th, minority 76th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 48113016513 considered part of The Greene?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113016513 fall within The Greene (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113016513?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 427 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113016513 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 21.81% of renter households, peaking at 40.8% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113016513 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.01× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113016513 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113016513 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related