Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally

North Lake Highlands Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113019016 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,600 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 48113019016 covers part of the North Lake Highlands area of Dallas, TX, and scores 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. roughly one in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Dallas County average of 47.9%.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 40% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units1,139
Renter share59.6%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate18.0%
Median income$66,696

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In North Lake Highlands
Very Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#155 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#192 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#2,131 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.9195, -96.7422 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Lake Highlands scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.0% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How North Lake Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Lake Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 019016Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 818Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 5.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.1%Peak (2008)
  • 22Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130190162000: 38 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2001: 66 filings (7.17/100 renter HHs)2002: 41 filings (4.45/100 renter HHs)2003: 38 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2004: 46 filings (4.99/100 renter HHs)2005: 60 filings (7.29/100 renter HHs)2006: 61 filings (7.41/100 renter HHs)2007: 63 filings (7.65/100 renter HHs)2008: 75 filings (9.11/100 renter HHs)2009: 55 filings (6.68/100 renter HHs)2010: 26 filings (3.11/100 renter HHs)2011: 27 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)2012: 61 filings (7.05/100 renter HHs)2013: 54 filings (6.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 38 filings (4.39/100 renter HHs)2015: 32 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)2016: 15 filings (1.76/100 renter HHs)2017: 22 filings (2.58/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 362Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.91×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-01-01: 6 filings (4.51× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 17 filings (4.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-08-01: 10 filings (4.29× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (7.52× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-11-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (1.91× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2022-02-01: 14 filings (4.20× baseline)2022-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (3.75× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-08-01: 10 filings (4.29× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 11 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (4.29× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (2.62× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (2.20× baseline)2023-08-01: 9 filings (3.86× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (8.27× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (2.45× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (1.91× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-07-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (2.15× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North Lake Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Lake Highlands

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

At $1,179 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Dallas commands. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. The filing record is not thin: 818 evictions over 18 years of observation.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.6 points. Filings peaked in 2008 at 9.1% of renter households.

In a typical year about 5.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 49th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019016

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019016?

Census tract 48113019016 in the North Lake Highlands neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019016?

Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019016?

18.0% of residents in tract 48113019016 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,600.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019016?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 59th, minority 80th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019016 considered part of North Lake Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019016 fall within North Lake Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019016?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 818 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019016 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.28% of renter households, peaking at 9.1% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019016 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.91× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113019016 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113019016 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related