Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Clinton Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 49011125304 · Davis, UT · pop 5,336

In Clinton in Davis County, census tract 49011125304 scores 4.1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 13% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,734 a month against an average household income of $98,172 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 7% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,546
Renter share16.4%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$98,172

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Clinton
Very High
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#25 of 66 tracts In Davis
Elevated
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#449 of 716 tracts In Utah
Low
National
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#75,086 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clinton and the region

Centroid at 41.1462, -112.0504 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clinton scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clinton
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,734 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clinton
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clinton
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clinton
3.7

How Clinton compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clinton risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 125304Clinton: 2.22.2Clintonparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 43Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.72%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.0%Peak (2009)
  • 4Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111253042006: 6 filings (6.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (11.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 10 filings (3.36/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (1.01/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (1.34/100 renter HHs)2016: 5 filings (1.85/100 renter HHs)2018: 4 filings (1.48/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clinton

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Clinton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 18th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125304?

Census tract 49011125304 in Clinton scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011125304?

Median gross rent is $1,734/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125304?

5.1% of residents in tract 49011125304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,336.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 30th, minority 38th, housing 13th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125304?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 43 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.72% of renter households, peaking at 11.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 49011125304 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 49011125304 compare to Clinton overall?

Tract 49011125304 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Clinton at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clinton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Clinton

Top eight tracts in Clinton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related