Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

The Oaks at Mutton Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Kaysville

Tract 49011126101 · Davis, UT · pop 7,238 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is The Oaks at Mutton Hollow in Kaysville for landlords? Census tract 49011126101 scores 3.6/10, the Lower tier. It lands near the 6th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 37% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,349 monthly, set against $107,559 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 17% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units2,270
Renter share27.7%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$107,559

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In The Oaks at Mutton Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Kaysville
Very High
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 66 tracts In Davis
Elevated
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#449 of 716 tracts In Utah
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kaysville and the region

Centroid at 41.0491, -111.9248 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Oaks at Mutton Hollow scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kaysville
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,349 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kaysville
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kaysville
3.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kaysville
2.8

How The Oaks at Mutton Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Oaks at Mutton Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 126101Kaysville: 1.91.9Kaysvilleparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 16Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 0.63%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.3%Peak (2006)
  • 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111261012006: 4 filings (1.28/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (1.28/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (0.22/100 renter HHs)2014: 2 filings (0.43/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (0.22/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2018: 2 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Oaks at Mutton Hollow

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 3.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kaysville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Davis County average of 4.0 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 16 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 0.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.3% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011126101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126101?

Census tract 49011126101 in the The Oaks at Mutton Hollow neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011126101?

Median gross rent is $1,349/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126101?

7.5% of residents in tract 49011126101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,238.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 38th, minority 16th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 49011126101 considered part of The Oaks at Mutton Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011126101 fall within The Oaks at Mutton Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.63% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011126101 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011126101 compare to Kaysville overall?

Tract 49011126101 scores 1.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Kaysville at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kaysville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kaysville

Top eight tracts in Kaysville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related