Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
The Oaks at Mutton Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Kaysville
Tract 49011126101 · Davis, UT · pop 7,238 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 49011126101 covers part of the The Oaks at Mutton Hollow area of Kaysville, UT, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 7,238. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.6/10.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 17%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units2,270
Renter share27.7%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$107,559
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
55
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Kaysville and the region
Centroid at 41.0491, -111.9248 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Oaks at Mutton Hollow scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Kaysville
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,349 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kaysville
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kaysville
3.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kaysville
2.8
How The Oaks at Mutton Hollow compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 13
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 13%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 16Total filings over 7 yrs
- 0.63%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.3%Peak (2006)
- 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.5%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.0%Transit barriers
- 6.9%No health insurance
- 15.9%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Oaks at Mutton Hollow
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.9/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.9% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 16 filings here across 7 tracked years. Housing insecurity runs 6.8% against 14.2% nationally.
At $1,349 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Kaysville commands. Filings peaked in 2006 at 1.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 0.6% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.2/10.
Against average income of $107,559, annual rent is just 15%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. 37% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011126101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126101?
Census tract 49011126101 in the The Oaks at Mutton Hollow neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011126101?
Median gross rent is $1,349/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126101?
7.5% of residents in tract 49011126101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,238.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 38th, minority 16th, housing 13th.
Q5
Is tract 49011126101 considered part of The Oaks at Mutton Hollow?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011126101 fall within The Oaks at Mutton Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.63% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49011126101 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49011126101 compare to Kaysville overall?
Tract 49011126101 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Kaysville at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kaysville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Kaysville
Top eight tracts in Kaysville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related