Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Sahara Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Layton

Tract 49011125807 · Davis, UT · pop 3,546 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 49011125807 (Sahara Village in Layton, Utah) comes in at 3.9/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 30% of renter households, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,365 monthly, set against $82,773 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 53% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 37% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,278
Renter share53.3%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$82,773

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sahara Village
Moderate
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 12 tracts In Layton
Elevated
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 66 tracts In Davis
High
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#358 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Layton and the region

Centroid at 41.0957, -111.9623 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sahara Village scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Layton
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,365 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Layton
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Layton
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Layton
4.9

How Sahara Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sahara Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 125807Layton: 2.12.1Laytonparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 135Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2014)
  • 23Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111258072006: 11 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)2009: 10 filings (0.98/100 renter HHs)2011: 17 filings (2.86/100 renter HHs)2014: 26 filings (4.37/100 renter HHs)2015: 25 filings (4.20/100 renter HHs)2016: 23 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2018: 23 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 109% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sahara Village

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Layton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Davis County average of 4.0 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125807

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125807?

Census tract 49011125807 in the Sahara Village neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011125807?

Median gross rent is $1,365/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125807?

7.0% of residents in tract 49011125807 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,546.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125807?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 40th, minority 53th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 49011125807 considered part of Sahara Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125807 fall within Sahara Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125807?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125807 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.85% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011125807 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011125807 compare to Layton overall?

Tract 49011125807 scores 2.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Layton at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Layton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Layton

Top eight tracts in Layton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related