Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Green Lawns Eviction Risk: Lower , Layton

Tract 49011126002 · Davis, UT · pop 8,534 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Eviction risk in the Green Lawns neighborhood of Layton centers on tract 49011126002, which scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 8,534 residents. That is riskier than about 24% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 72% of renter households, a severe level, and 55% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,563 a month while the average household earns $128,233 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 3% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,443
Renter share10.8%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$128,233

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Green Lawns
Moderate
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 12 tracts In Layton
Low
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#32 of 66 tracts In Davis
Moderate
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#506 of 716 tracts In Utah
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Layton and the region

Centroid at 41.0594, -111.9931 · click any tract to drill in

Why Green Lawns scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Layton
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,563 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Layton
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Layton
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Layton
4.9

How Green Lawns compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Green Lawns risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 126002Layton: 2.12.1Laytonparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 7

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 28Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak (2006)
  • 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111260022006: 5 filings (2.18/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (1.31/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (2.70/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2018: 3 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Green Lawns

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Layton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davis County average of 4.0 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 28 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 2.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.2% of renter households in 2006.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011126002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126002?

Census tract 49011126002 in the Green Lawns neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011126002?

Median gross rent is $1,563/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126002?

9.9% of residents in tract 49011126002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,534.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 17th, minority 18th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 49011126002 considered part of Green Lawns?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011126002 fall within Green Lawns (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 28 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.39% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49011126002 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49011126002 compare to Layton overall?

Tract 49011126002 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Layton at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Layton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Layton

Top eight tracts in Layton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related