Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Camas Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53011040608 · Clark County, WA · pop 4,820 · 60% of tract blocks fall in Camas

The Moderate-tier score of 4.9/10 for census tract 53011040608 reflects conditions in Camas, Washington. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,989 a month while the average household earns $118,365 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 15% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,823
Renter share27.1%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$118,365

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Camas
Elevated
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#92 of 115 tracts In Clark County
Low
Within state
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#1,558 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#69,776 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camas and the region

Centroid at 45.6152, -122.4559 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camas scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camas
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,989 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camas
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camas
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camas
3.9

How Camas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 040608Camas: 6.76.7Camasparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 8Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 1.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2015)
  • 4Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530110406082004: 1 filings (2.47/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (2.89/100 renter HHs)2012: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (0.48/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (1.93/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 8 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camas

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clark County average of 5.1 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 1.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.9% of renter households in 2015.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53011040608

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53011040608?

Census tract 53011040608 in Camas scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53011040608?

Median gross rent is $1,989/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53011040608?

7.1% of residents in tract 53011040608 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,820.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53011040608?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 17th, minority 51th, housing 80th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53011040608?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 53011040608 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.94% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53011040608 compare to Camas overall?

Tract 53011040608 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Camas at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camas

Top eight tracts in Camas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related