Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Pacific Avenue Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053063200 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,906 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

For landlords sizing up the Pacific Avenue neighborhood of Tacoma, census tract 53053063200 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 68% of renter households, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,810 a month while the average household earns $88,297 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 25% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 8% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,950
Renter share25.4%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate17.9%
Median income$88,297

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Pacific Avenue
High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Elevated
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#34 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
High
Within state
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#382 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.1990, -122.4322 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pacific Avenue scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$1,810 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Pacific Avenue compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pacific Avenue risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 063200Tacoma: 7.87.8Tacomaparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 146Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 2.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2005)
  • 13Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530632002004: 11 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)2005: 19 filings (4.61/100 renter HHs)2006: 18 filings (4.37/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2008: 9 filings (2.18/100 renter HHs)2009: 16 filings (3.88/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (1.39/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (1.39/100 renter HHs)2014: 12 filings (1.66/100 renter HHs)2015: 13 filings (1.80/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 18% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 66Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.33×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (15.15× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pacific Avenue. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pacific Avenue

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 146 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 2.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.6% of renter households in 2005.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053063200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053063200?

Census tract 53053063200 in the Pacific Avenue neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053063200?

Median gross rent is $1,810/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053063200?

17.9% of residents in tract 53053063200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,906.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053063200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 65th, minority 59th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 53053063200 considered part of Pacific Avenue?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053063200 fall within Pacific Avenue (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053063200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 146 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053063200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.75% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053063200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053063200 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053063200 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 53053063200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related