Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #25,210 of 84,120 nationally

Pacific Avenue Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053063302 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,822 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 53053063302 sits in the Pacific Avenue neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 4,822 and an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). 30% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 20% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,955/month against a median household income of $90,729 — roughly 26% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 8% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,413
Renter share10.8%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate18.8%
Median income$90,729

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank — 0th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 5 tracts In Pacific Avenue
Very Low
Within parent city
18 th percentile
Rank — 18th percentileBottomTop
#41 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Very Low
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank — 58th percentileBottomTop
#81 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Elevated
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank — 84th percentileBottomTop
#277 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2000, -122.4162 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pacific Avenue scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
18.8% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,955 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Pacific Avenue compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pacific Avenue risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 063302Tacoma: 7.47.4Tacomaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.25.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 45Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.12×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pacific Avenue. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053063302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053063302?

Census tract 53053063302 in the Pacific Avenue neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053063302?

Median gross rent is $1,955/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053063302?

18.8% of residents in tract 53053063302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,822.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053063302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 92th, minority 84th, housing 63th.

Q5

Is tract 53053063302 considered part of Pacific Avenue?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053063302 fall within Pacific Avenue (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).

Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053063302 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.12× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.

Q7

How does tract 53053063302 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053063302 scores 5.8/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q8

Was tract 53053063302 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related