Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Pacific Avenue Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053062502 · Pierce County, WA · pop 3,381 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Here is how census tract 53053062502, in the Pacific Avenue neighborhood of Tacoma eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a $1/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,381. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,167 a month while the average household earns $71,415 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 9% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,330
Renter share23.9%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$71,415

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Pacific Avenue
Low
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Low
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Elevated
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#621 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2101, -122.4519 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pacific Avenue scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,167 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Pacific Avenue compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pacific Avenue risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 062502Tacoma: 7.87.8Tacomaparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 39Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pacific Avenue. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pacific Avenue

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.81x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

Part of this tract, about 8% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053062502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053062502?

Census tract 53053062502 in the Pacific Avenue neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053062502?

Median gross rent is $2,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053062502?

4.0% of residents in tract 53053062502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,381.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053062502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 62th, minority 65th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 53053062502 considered part of Pacific Avenue?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053062502 fall within Pacific Avenue (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053062502 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 53053062502 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053062502 scores 5.1/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 53053062502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related