Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma

Tract 53053071601 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,713 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 53053071601, home to 4,713 residents in Larchmont in Tacoma, scores 6.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 79th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,411 a month while the average household earns $69,067 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 46% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 22% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,662
Renter share45.5%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate20.2%
Median income$69,067

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Larchmont
High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tacoma
Very High
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#215 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.1798, -122.4100 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
20.2% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$1,411 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.7

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larchmont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 071601Tacoma: 7.87.8Tacomaparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 389Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2015)
  • 49Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530716012004: 37 filings (4.97/100 renter HHs)2005: 41 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2006: 31 filings (3.46/100 renter HHs)2007: 45 filings (5.03/100 renter HHs)2008: 37 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2009: 38 filings (4.25/100 renter HHs)2010: 29 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2012: 23 filings (2.59/100 renter HHs)2013: 31 filings (3.49/100 renter HHs)2014: 28 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2015: 49 filings (5.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 32% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 108Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.56×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (2.15× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (2.15× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larchmont

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 389 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 4.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.5% of renter households in 2015.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053071601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053071601?

Census tract 53053071601 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053071601?

Median gross rent is $1,411/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053071601?

20.2% of residents in tract 53053071601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,713.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053071601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 93th, minority 65th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 53053071601 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053071601 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053071601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 389 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053071601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.04% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053071601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.56× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053071601 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053071601 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related