Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,526 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tacoma

Tract 53053071705 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,504 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 53053071705 sits in the Larchmont neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 4,504 and an eviction-risk score of 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). 70% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 18% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,658/month against a median household income of $69,688 — roughly 29% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 9% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,517
Renter share29.2%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate13.0%
Median income$69,688

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank — 50th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 9 tracts In Larchmont
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank — 75th percentileBottomTop
#3 of 9 tracts In Tacoma
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank — 80th percentileBottomTop
#40 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank — 93th percentileBottomTop
#127 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.1642, -122.4434 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 6.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
13.0% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,658 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.1

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larchmont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.16.1This tracttract 071705Tacoma: 7.47.4Tacomaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.25.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 232Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.57%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.9%Peak (2007)
  • 14Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 — 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530717052004: 26 filings (4.84/100 renter HHs)2005: 25 filings (4.50/100 renter HHs)2006: 26 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2007: 27 filings (4.86/100 renter HHs)2008: 16 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (2.70/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2012: 22 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2013: 26 filings (3.86/100 renter HHs)2014: 20 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (2.08/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 46% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 82Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.53×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053071705

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053071705?

Census tract 53053071705 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053071705?

Median gross rent is $1,658/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053071705?

13.0% of residents in tract 53053071705 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,504.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053071705?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 76th, minority 72th, housing 76th.

Q5

Is tract 53053071705 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053071705 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053071705?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 232 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053071705 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.57% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053071705 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.53× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply — likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 53053071705 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053071705 scores 6.1/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q9

Was tract 53053071705 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related