Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,252 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053063501 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,514 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 53053063501 sits in the Larchmont neighborhood of Tacoma, Washington. It has a population of 4,514 and an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). 36% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 16% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,482/month against a median household income of $76,985 — roughly 23% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 27% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,631
Renter share43.0%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$76,985

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank — 13th percentileBottomTop
#8 of 9 tracts In Larchmont
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank — 14th percentileBottomTop
#43 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Very Low
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank — 54th percentileBottomTop
#89 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Moderate
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank — 80th percentileBottomTop
#354 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.1864, -122.4524 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,482 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Larchmont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 063501Tacoma: 7.47.4Tacomaparent cityCounty: 5.55.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.25.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 278Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.8%Peak (2015)
  • 34Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 — 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530635012004: 27 filings (4.46/100 renter HHs)2005: 22 filings (3.60/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (4.91/100 renter HHs)2007: 19 filings (3.11/100 renter HHs)2008: 26 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2009: 20 filings (3.27/100 renter HHs)2010: 33 filings (5.07/100 renter HHs)2012: 17 filings (2.39/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (3.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 27 filings (3.80/100 renter HHs)2015: 34 filings (4.79/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 26% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 139Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.69×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-07-01: 14 filings (6.01× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-11-01: 14 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (1.94× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053063501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053063501?

Census tract 53053063501 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053063501?

Median gross rent is $1,482/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053063501?

10.1% of residents in tract 53053063501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,514.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053063501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 54th, minority 69th, housing 26th.

Q5

Is tract 53053063501 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053063501 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053063501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 278 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053063501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.90% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053063501 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.69× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply — likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 53053063501 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053063501 scores 5.7/10 — lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q9

Was tract 53053063501 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related