Skip to content
Charlotte, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,466 residents

Charlotte, TX Eviction Risk: LOW

Atascosa County · Population 1,466

In 2026
Risk score
2.7
LOW

90th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.2 Now2.7
3.0 1.8 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.8 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.2 2015 · score 2.2 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 3.0 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.7 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.7

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.0 Regional 4.0 State 1.5 Economic 8.4 Supply 2.6 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.8 Tenant 2.6 Housing 1.6 2.7 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +43.3% (2024)
    4.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.0
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    37.7% poverty · 5.9% unemp.
    8.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $911 average · 9.8% renters
    2.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    36.8% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    28 days filing → judgment
    1.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    9.8% renters
    2.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charlotte and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Charlotte compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Atascosa County
High
#2 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 cities in Atascosa County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
High
#203 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 89th percentileLowHigh
#203 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Charlotte risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Charlotte: 2.72.7CharlotteThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.7
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 28d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $911/mo. A contested eviction takes 28 days and costs $854–$4,012 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 9.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,466 residents, 9.8% rent. 37% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 37.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4 and 4 (GOP margin +43.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.8, housing court bias 1.6, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.4. Supply constraint: 2.6. The numbers behind those: 37.7% poverty, 5.9% unemployment, 37% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Charlotte sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.7 Corpus Christi Plano, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.3 Plano Lubbock, TX · 23d · ~$2.5k all-in ($109/day) · score 2.7 Lubbock Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Charlotte
Charlotte · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Charlotte, TX

Landlording in Charlotte, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Charlotte is a city of 1,466 residents where 9.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 36.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $911/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Charlotte eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Charlotte closes 28 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Charlotte's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Charlotte runs $854 to $4,012 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 28 days of typical timeline and $911/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.6/10 in Charlotte, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Charlotte: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,012 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Charlotte

Trap · 4.2/10
The 4.2/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Charlotte-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I change the locks if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

No, absolutely not. Self-help evictions like changing locks, turning off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings are illegal in Texas. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Doing otherwise can lead to significant penalties, including lawsuits from the tenant.

Q2

What if my tenant appeals the eviction judgment?

If a tenant appeals, the case moves to the County Court at Law. This will add time and cost to the process. You'll likely need an attorney to handle the appeal. The tenant usually has to pay a bond to appeal, but sometimes they can file a pauper's affidavit, which waives the bond requirement.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Charlotte?

While you can represent yourself in Justice Court, it's often wise to hire an attorney, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or you're unsure about the process. An attorney ensures all legal requirements are met, speeding up the process and reducing potential errors. Given the typical cost range, attorney fees are a significant part of the budget.

Q4

Are there rent control laws in Charlotte, TX?

No. Texas has a statewide prohibition on rent control. Charlotte, like other cities in Texas, cannot implement rent control measures. This is reflected in the very low rent-control-risk score of 0.5/10. You are generally free to set market rates for your rentals. For more information, see our Texas rent control rules.

Q5

What are my responsibilities for property maintenance?

Landlords in Texas are generally required to make a diligent effort to repair or remedy any condition that materially affects the physical health or safety of an ordinary tenant, provided the tenant gave proper notice. This includes things like plumbing, heating, and structural issues. Your lease should outline maintenance responsibilities clearly. For comprehensive tenant protections, refer to our Texas tenant protections guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.7/10 places Charlotte in the 90th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.