Skip to content
New Summerfield, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 618 residents

New Summerfield, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cherokee County · Population 618

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

58th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average1.9 Now2.3
2.6 1.5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 1.9 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.7 1995 · score 1.7 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 1.8 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 1.9 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.8 2007 · score 1.8 2008 · score 2.0 2009 · score 2.1 2010 · score 2.2 2011 · score 2.2 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 1.9 2015 · score 1.9 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.5 2022 · score 2.3 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.0 Regional 3.0 State 1.5 Economic 6.3 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 1.3 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 6.3 Housing 3.3 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +62.7% (2024)
    3.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.0
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    10.1% poverty · 6.1% unemp.
    6.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $970 average · 24.0% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    16.5% of income on rent
    1.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    24.0% renters
    6.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across New Summerfield and the region

Click any city to see its score

How New Summerfield compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cherokee County
Elevated
#4 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 57th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 8 cities in Cherokee County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Moderate
#909 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 51st percentileLowHigh
#909 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
New Summerfield risk score vs. county / state / U.S.New Summerfield: 2.32.3New SummerfieldThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $970/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $939–$3,486 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 24.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 618 residents, 24.0% rent. 17% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3 and 3 (GOP margin +62.7% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 3.3, rent-control risk 1.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.3. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 10.1% poverty, 6.1% unemployment, 17% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

New Summerfield sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Tyler, TX · 26d · ~$2.5k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.7 Tyler Longview, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($84/day) · score 2.3 Longview Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.7 Corpus Christi Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle New Summerfield
New Summerfield · 26d · ~$2.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in New Summerfield, TX

Landlording in New Summerfield, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

New Summerfield is a city of 618 residents where 24.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 16.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $970/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How New Summerfield eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in New Summerfield closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of New Summerfield's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in New Summerfield runs $939 to $3,486 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $970/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.3/10 in New Summerfield, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in New Summerfield: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,486 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in New Summerfield

Trap · 3.3/10
For landlords, the 3.8/10 score is most actionable when combined with Cherokee County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 3.3/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in New Summerfield without going to court?

No. In Texas, you cannot use "self-help" methods like changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings to force them out. You must follow the legal eviction process through the Justice Court. Any attempt to bypass the court can result in significant penalties against you.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after the judge rules against them?

After the judge issues a Judgment for Possession, the tenant typically has five days to appeal the decision. If they don't appeal, you can request a Writ of Possession. Once the Writ is issued and served by the constable, the tenant usually has 24-48 hours before the physical lockout. The total process from judgment to lockout is often around 7-10 days, not including the initial notice and court hearing.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in New Summerfield?

For a straightforward non-payment eviction, many landlords represent themselves in Justice Court. However, if the tenant hires an attorney, or if the case involves complex issues (e.g., lease violations other than non-payment, counterclaims by the tenant), it's highly advisable to hire an attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law. They can ensure you navigate the process correctly and protect your interests.

Q4

What if the tenant leaves property behind after an eviction?

Texas law (Tex. Prop. Code § 92.008) requires you to store a tenant's abandoned property if you reasonably believe it has value. You must send a notice to the tenant's last known address informing them where the property is stored and that they have a certain amount of time (usually 30 days) to retrieve it. After that, you can dispose of it, sell it, or donate it, keeping records of everything.

Q5

Can I charge late fees in New Summerfield?

Yes, Texas law allows landlords to charge reasonable late fees, provided they are outlined in your lease agreement. The fee must be reasonable and related to the actual costs incurred by the landlord due to the late payment. Generally, an initial late fee of 10-12% of the monthly rent for properties with 1-4 units is considered reasonable, plus a daily fee for each day the rent remains unpaid.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places New Summerfield in the 58th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.