Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Dallas Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113005600 · Dallas, TX · pop 7,850

48113005600 is a census tract in Dallas, TX. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 7,850. Adults with no health insurance runs 42.7% against 11.3% nationally.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 20% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,890
Renter share42.4%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate25.6%
Median income$58,058

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#30 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#99 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,049 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7125, -96.8208 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dallas scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
25.6% poverty · this tract
6.4
Supply constraint
$1,513 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Dallas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dallas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 005600Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 986Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 7.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.0%Peak (2002)
  • 39Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130056002000: 79 filings (12.77/100 renter HHs)2001: 80 filings (12.93/100 renter HHs)2002: 93 filings (15.04/100 renter HHs)2003: 56 filings (9.05/100 renter HHs)2004: 59 filings (9.54/100 renter HHs)2005: 56 filings (7.55/100 renter HHs)2006: 74 filings (9.98/100 renter HHs)2007: 56 filings (7.55/100 renter HHs)2008: 56 filings (7.55/100 renter HHs)2009: 44 filings (5.93/100 renter HHs)2010: 54 filings (8.97/100 renter HHs)2011: 48 filings (6.15/100 renter HHs)2012: 35 filings (4.49/100 renter HHs)2013: 54 filings (6.92/100 renter HHs)2014: 46 filings (5.90/100 renter HHs)2015: 35 filings (4.49/100 renter HHs)2016: 22 filings (2.96/100 renter HHs)2017: 39 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 51% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 283Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (6.01× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2023-08-01: 20 filings (7.49× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 15 filings (7.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (3.43× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (7.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 11 filings (4.72× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dallas

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Against Dallas County at 47.9%, 53% of renters here are cost-burdened.

The filing record is not thin: 986 evictions over 18 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2002, when 15.0% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 7.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113005600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113005600?

Census tract 48113005600 in Dallas scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113005600?

Median gross rent is $1,513/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113005600?

25.6% of residents in tract 48113005600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,850.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113005600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 92th, minority 98th, housing 44th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113005600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 986 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113005600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.95% of renter households, peaking at 15.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113005600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113005600 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113005600 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113005600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related