Skip to content
Kemah, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,168 residents

Kemah, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Galveston County · Population 2,168

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

68th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.2 Now2.4
2.8 1.8 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.3 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.1 1993 · score 2.1 1994 · score 2.1 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.1 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.2 2014 · score 2.1 2015 · score 2.1 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 2.8 2021 · score 2.7 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.5 2025 · score 2.5 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 1.5 Economic 6.9 Supply 7.9 Rent Control 4.7 Eviction 1.0 Tenant 7.4 Housing 6.2 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +27.4% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    18.3% poverty · 4.6% unemp.
    6.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,775 average · 46.3% renters
    7.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    38.8% of income on rent
    4.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    25 days filing → judgment
    1.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    46.3% renters
    7.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kemah and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Kemah compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Galveston County
Moderate
#10 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 40th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 16 cities in Galveston County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Elevated
#666 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 64th percentileLowHigh
#666 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Kemah risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Kemah: 2.42.4KemahThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 25d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,775/mo. A contested eviction takes 25 days and costs $974–$3,760 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 46.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,168 residents, 46.3% rent. 39% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 18.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +27.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1, housing court bias 6.2, rent-control risk 4.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-4.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.9. Supply constraint: 7.9. The numbers behind those: 18.3% poverty, 4.6% unemployment, 39% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Kemah sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Pasadena, TX · 27d · ~$2.3k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.7 Pasadena Pearland, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.2 Pearland League City, TX · 27d · ~$2.0k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.5 League City Sugar Land, TX · 26d · ~$2.3k all-in ($87/day) · score 2.3 Sugar Land Atascocita, TX · 23d · ~$2.1k all-in ($93/day) · score 2.2 Atascocita Baytown, TX · 23d · ~$2.2k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.8 Baytown Missouri City, TX · 27d · ~$2.4k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.3 Missouri City Spring, TX · 25d · ~$2.3k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.2 Spring Texas City, TX · 26d · ~$2.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 2.4 Texas City Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Kemah
Kemah · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Kemah, TX

Landlording in Kemah, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Kemah is a city of 2,168 residents where 46.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 38.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,775/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Kemah eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Kemah closes 25 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Kemah's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Kemah runs $974 to $3,760 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 25 days of typical timeline and $1,775/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.4/10 in Kemah, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Kemah: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,760 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Kemah

Trap · 46.3%
46.3% renter share against 2,168 residents produces roughly 1,004 rental occupants in Kemah. Galveston County voted R 22.6% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give the 3-day notice?

Texas law can be tricky here. Accepting partial payment *after* you've issued a notice to vacate can sometimes be interpreted as waiving your right to evict based on that specific notice. It's often best to refuse partial payment once the notice is delivered. If you do accept it, consult an attorney immediately to understand if you need to issue a new notice or if your current process is still valid.
Q2

Can I turn off utilities if my tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings (self-help eviction) is illegal in Texas and can lead to you being sued for damages, including punitive damages, and potentially facing criminal charges. Always follow the legal eviction process through the courts.
Q3

How long does a tenant have to move out after the judge orders an eviction?

After the judge issues a Judgment for Possession, the tenant has 5 days to appeal the decision. If they don't appeal, you can then request a Writ of Possession. Once the Writ is issued, the constable or sheriff will post a 24-hour notice on the property before physically removing the tenant. So, effectively, it's about 6-7 days from the judgment before the lockout can occur.
Q4

What if the tenant leaves personal property behind after eviction?

Under Texas eviction risk overview, you generally must store the tenant's property for a reasonable period, typically 30 days, and notify the tenant of where it's stored. If they don't retrieve it, you can sell it or dispose of it. Keep detailed records of everything. Check Tex. Prop. Code § 91.001(d) and § 92.008 for specifics. Don't just toss everything to the curb.
Q5

Can I charge late fees in Kemah?

Yes, Texas law allows landlords to charge reasonable late fees. Your lease agreement must clearly state the amount of the late fee and when it applies. Typically, late fees are allowed if rent is not paid within two full days after the due date. The fee must be reasonable and not exceed certain statutory limits based on the rent amount.
Q6

Is there rent control in Kemah?

No, there is no rent control in Kemah or anywhere else in Texas. The state explicitly prohibits cities and counties from enacting rent control ordinances. This means you are free to set rent prices based on market conditions when a lease renews or a new tenant moves in.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places Kemah in the 68th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.