Skip to content
Fielding, Utah eviction risk overview
City brief · 746 residents

Fielding, UT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cache County · Population 746

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

66th percentile, Utah.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.6 Now2.1
2.1 1.3 1976 · score 1.6 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.8 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.7 1985 · score 1.7 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.3 1990 · score 1.3 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.4 1993 · score 1.4 1994 · score 1.4 1995 · score 1.4 1996 · score 1.4 1997 · score 1.4 1998 · score 1.4 1999 · score 1.4 2000 · score 1.3 2001 · score 1.4 2002 · score 1.5 2003 · score 1.4 2004 · score 1.4 2005 · score 1.4 2006 · score 1.3 2007 · score 1.3 2008 · score 1.4 2009 · score 1.7 2010 · score 1.7 2011 · score 1.7 2012 · score 1.5 2013 · score 1.4 2014 · score 1.4 2015 · score 1.4 2016 · score 1.8 2017 · score 1.8 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.1 2021 · score 1.9 2022 · score 1.9 2023 · score 1.9 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 3.8 State 1.9 Economic 5.3 Supply 5.7 Rent Control 2.7 Eviction 1.7 Tenant 6.3 Housing 3.0 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +34.4% (2024)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.8
  3. State political climate
    Utah legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    5.1% poverty · 6.3% unemp.
    5.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $975 average · 26.7% renters
    5.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.3% of income on rent
    2.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    25 days filing → judgment
    1.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    26.7% renters
    6.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fielding and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Fielding compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cache County
High
#8 of 33 cities
Rank in county, 78th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 33 cities in Cache County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Utah
Elevated
#129 of 333 cities
Rank in state, 61st percentileLowHigh
#129 of 333 cities in Utah for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Fielding risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Fielding: 2.12.1FieldingThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 25d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $975/mo. A contested eviction takes 25 days and costs $897–$2,818 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 26.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 746 residents, 26.7% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 3.8 (GOP margin +34.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.7, housing court bias 3, rent-control risk 2.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.3. Supply constraint: 5.7. The numbers behind those: 5.1% poverty, 6.3% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Fielding sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Ogden, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7 Ogden Logan, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.2 Logan Salt Lake City, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.9 Salt Lake City West Valley City, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.6 West Valley City West Jordan, UT · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.3 West Jordan Provo, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.2 Provo St. George, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 St. George Orem, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 Orem Sandy, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Sandy Lehi, UT · 24d · ~$2.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.2 Lehi Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Fielding
Fielding · 25d · ~$1.9k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Fielding, UT

Landlording in Fielding, Utah, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Fielding is a city of 746 residents where 26.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $975/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Fielding eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Fielding closes 25 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Fielding's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Fielding runs $897 to $2,818 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 25 days of typical timeline and $975/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.3/10 in Fielding, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Utah, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Fielding: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Utah's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,818 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Fielding

Trap · 2.7/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Fielding's 2.8/10 is below the Utah state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 2.7/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Fielding without a reason?

For month-to-month leases, yes, generally. Utah does not have a statewide "just-cause" eviction requirement for terminating a tenancy. You still need to give proper notice (typically 15 days for no-cause termination) and follow the legal process. This is a significant advantage for landlords here. For more on this, see our Utah tenant protections page.

Q2

How much can I charge for late fees in Fielding?

Utah law does not specify a maximum late fee amount. However, the fee must be "reasonable" and clearly stated in your lease agreement. What's reasonable often means it's proportional to the rent and doesn't act as a penalty. For example, 5-10% of the monthly rent is generally considered reasonable.

Q3

Do I need to give a tenant a chance to fix a lease violation before evicting?

It depends on the violation. For non-payment of rent, the 3-day notice is "pay or quit," meaning they can pay or leave. For other violations (like unauthorized pets or property damage), you might issue a "cure or quit" notice, giving them a chance to fix the issue within a certain timeframe (often 3-10 days) or face eviction. Your lease should specify these terms.

Q4

Can I refuse to rent to someone using a housing voucher in Fielding?

Yes, in Utah, there is no statewide "source-of-income" protection. This means you are generally not required to accept tenants who use housing vouchers (like Section 8). However, always be consistent with your screening and application process to avoid claims of other forms of discrimination.

Q5

What if the tenant leaves personal property behind after an eviction?

Utah law requires you to store the tenant's property for a certain period (usually 15 days) and notify the tenant. If they don't claim it, you can sell it or dispose of it. Keep detailed records of the property and your attempts to contact the tenant. Failing to follow these rules can lead to liability.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places Fielding in the 66th percentile of Utah cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.