Within parent city
44
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Bountiful Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011126500 · Davis, UT · pop 6,042 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Bountiful
Census tract 49011126500 sits in Bountiful eviction risk, Utah eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.8/10. That is riskier than about 30% of US census tracts.
73% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,140 monthly, set against $107,669 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,785
Renter share11.7%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$107,669
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
42
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
22
th percentile
Low
National
6
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bountiful and the region
Centroid at 40.8949, -111.8619 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bountiful scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,140 rent vs county FMR
9.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bountiful
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bountiful
4.8
How Bountiful compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 13%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 13Total filings over 6 yrs
- 1.20%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.9%Peak (2011)
- 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.9%Food insecurity
- 3.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 15.1%Frequent mental distress
- 27.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bountiful
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davis County average of 4.0 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 1.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.9% of renter households in 2011.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011126500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126500?
Census tract 49011126500 in Bountiful scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011126500?
Median gross rent is $2,140/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126500?
2.6% of residents in tract 49011126500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,042.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 36th, minority 13th, housing 38th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 49011126500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.20% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49011126500 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49011126500 compare to Bountiful overall?
Tract 49011126500 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Bountiful at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bountiful
Top eight tracts in Bountiful ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
49011126902
2.9
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126600
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126700
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126901
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126406
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126402
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126405
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126801
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Related