Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Bountiful Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 49011126500 · Davis, UT · pop 6,042 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Bountiful

Census tract 49011126500 covers part of Bountiful, UT, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,042 residents. 73% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Davis County average of 38.9%.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 3% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,785
Renter share11.7%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$107,669

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 10 tracts In Bountiful
Moderate
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 66 tracts In Davis
Moderate
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#372 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bountiful and the region

Centroid at 40.8949, -111.8619 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bountiful scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,140 rent vs county FMR
9.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bountiful
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bountiful
4.8

How Bountiful compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bountiful risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 1265003.5Bountifulparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 13Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49011126500
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bountiful

The voucher gap is 39.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Average gross rent is $2,140, 37% above the Bountiful average.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 9/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

SNAP participation runs 3.5% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 6.9% against 17.8% nationally.

The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 13 evictions over 6 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2011 at 1.9% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.2% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.6/10.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011126500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126500?

Census tract 49011126500 in Bountiful scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49011126500?

Median gross rent is $2,140/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126500?

2.6% of residents in tract 49011126500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,042.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 36th, minority 13th, housing 38th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 49011126500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.20% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 49011126500 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 49011126500 compare to Bountiful overall?

Tract 49011126500 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Bountiful at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bountiful

Top eight tracts in Bountiful ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related