Bountiful Eviction Risk: Moderate

Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.9/10. Cost burden runs 49% here against 38.9% across Davis County. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10.

It sits 1.3 points above the Davis County average of 3.6. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.

The voucher gap is 16.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The filing record is not thin: 135 evictions over 7 years of observation.

At $1,783 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Bountiful commands. Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2011, when 3.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 2.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Statute speed, court posture and rent-regulation exposure are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk rather than measured on these blocks; the economic and supply components are the tract-level part of the score. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10. Statewide the UT average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.