Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Bountiful Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011126902 · Davis, UT · pop 7,380 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Bountiful
For landlords sizing up Bountiful, census tract 49011126902 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 34% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,783 a month against an average household income of $76,635 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units2,427
Renter share47.1%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$76,635
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
94
th percentile
Very High
Within state
67
th percentile
Elevated
National
29
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bountiful and the region
Centroid at 40.8623, -111.8837 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bountiful scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,783 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bountiful
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bountiful
4.8
How Bountiful compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 43%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 135Total filings over 7 yrs
- 2.35%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.1%Peak (2011)
- 16Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 30% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.1%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 8.3%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 28.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bountiful
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davis County average of 4.0 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 135 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 2.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.1% of renter households in 2011.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011126902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126902?
Census tract 49011126902 in Bountiful scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011126902?
Median gross rent is $1,783/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126902?
12.8% of residents in tract 49011126902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,380.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 59th, minority 35th, housing 43th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126902?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.35% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49011126902 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49011126902 compare to Bountiful overall?
Tract 49011126902 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bountiful at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bountiful
Top eight tracts in Bountiful ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
49011126600
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126700
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126901
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126406
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126500
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126801
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126802
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126402
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Related