Within parent city
89
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally
Bountiful Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49011126600 · Davis, UT · pop 5,438 · 93% of tract blocks fall in Bountiful
Tract 49011126600, home to 5,438 residents in Bountiful, scores 4.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #63,587 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
47% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,383 a month while the average household earns $71,215 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,905
Renter share41.1%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$71,215
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
National
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bountiful and the region
Centroid at 40.8999, -111.8827 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bountiful scores 2.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,383 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bountiful
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bountiful
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bountiful
4.8
How Bountiful compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 36Total filings over 7 yrs
- 0.67%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.1%Peak (2018)
- 8Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 60% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.6%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 9.3%No health insurance
- 17.5%Frequent mental distress
- 31.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bountiful
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davis County average of 4.0 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 36 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 0.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.1% of renter households in 2018.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 45th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011126600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011126600?
Census tract 49011126600 in Bountiful scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011126600?
Median gross rent is $1,383/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011126600?
10.3% of residents in tract 49011126600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,438.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011126600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 61th, minority 27th, housing 52th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011126600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 36 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011126600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.67% of renter households, peaking at 1.1% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49011126600 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49011126600 compare to Bountiful overall?
Tract 49011126600 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of Bountiful at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bountiful eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Bountiful
Top eight tracts in Bountiful ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
49011126902
2.9
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126700
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126901
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
49011126406
1.8
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126500
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126402
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126405
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
49011126801
1.1
/ 10 · Very Low
Related