Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Coventry Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Clearfield

Tract 49011125600 · Davis, UT · pop 238 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Eviction risk in the Coventry Park area of Clearfield centers on tract 49011125600, which scores $1/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 238 residents. It lands near the 37th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 78% of renter households, a severe level, and 61% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $93,625 a year. Renters make up 27% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 6% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units85
Renter share27.1%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate18.5%
Median income$93,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Coventry Park
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Clearfield
Moderate
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 66 tracts In Davis
High
Within state
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#248 of 716 tracts In Utah
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clearfield and the region

Centroid at 41.0974, -112.0341 · click any tract to drill in

Why Coventry Park scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clearfield
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
18.5% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clearfield
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clearfield
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clearfield
6.0

How Coventry Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Coventry Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 125600Clearfield: 2.12.1Clearfieldparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 63

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 34Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 10.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.9%Peak (2018)
  • 7Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490111256002006: 3 filings (10.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 5 filings (16.67/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (5.56/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (8.51/100 renter HHs)2018: 7 filings (14.89/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 133% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Coventry Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Coventry Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Clearfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davis County average of 4.0 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125600?

Census tract 49011125600 in the Coventry Park neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125600?

18.5% of residents in tract 49011125600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 238.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 61th, minority 2th, housing 63th.
Q4

Is tract 49011125600 considered part of Coventry Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125600 fall within Coventry Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 34 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.13% of renter households, peaking at 14.9% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 49011125600 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 49011125600 compare to Clearfield overall?

Tract 49011125600 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of Clearfield at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clearfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Clearfield

Top eight tracts in Clearfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related