Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Sahara Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Layton
Tract 49011125807 · Davis, UT · pop 3,546 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Census tract 49011125807 covers part of the Sahara Village area of Layton, UT, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,546 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.7/10.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 37%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,278
Renter share53.3%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$82,773
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
73
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
77
th percentile
High
Within state
72
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Layton and the region
Centroid at 41.0957, -111.9623 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sahara Village scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Layton
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,365 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Layton
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Layton
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Layton
4.9
How Sahara Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 65
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 40%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 67%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 135Total filings over 7 yrs
- 2.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.4%Peak (2014)
- 23Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 109% over the past 7 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.7%Housing insecurity
- 7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.7%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 12.3%No health insurance
- 19.4%Frequent mental distress
- 28.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sahara Village
30% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Davis County average of 38.9%. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
Court records carry 135 eviction filings across 7 observed years. SNAP participation runs 7.0% against 15.2% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,365, 11% below the Layton average. The worst year on record was 2014, when 4.4% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #47,371 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.9/10.
It tracks the Davis County average of 3.6 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49011125807
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125807?
Census tract 49011125807 in the Sahara Village neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49011125807?
Median gross rent is $1,365/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125807?
7.0% of residents in tract 49011125807 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,546.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125807?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 40th, minority 53th, housing 67th.
Q5
Is tract 49011125807 considered part of Sahara Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49011125807 fall within Sahara Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49011125807?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49011125807 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.85% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49011125807 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49011125807 compare to Layton overall?
Tract 49011125807 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Layton at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Layton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Layton
Top eight tracts in Layton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
Lakeland
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Holt
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Spring Hollow
4.7
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Tiffany Park
3.9
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
The Colonies
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Nalder Heights
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Coventry Park
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Ridgeview Park
3.3
/ 10 · Low
Related