Skip to content
Kennewick, Washington eviction risk overview
Ranked #425 of 1,865 nationally

Kennewick, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Benton County · Population 85,295

In 2026
Risk score
6.5
ELEVATED

84th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average3.4 Now6.5
10 5 1976 · score 1.4 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.5 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.3 1991 · score 2.3 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.9 1998 · score 2.9 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.1 2003 · score 3.1 2004 · score 3.2 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.2 2011 · score 4.3 2012 · score 4.3 2013 · score 4.4 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.8 2017 · score 5.0 2018 · score 5.2 2019 · score 5.5 2020 · score 6.2 2021 · score 6.3 2022 · score 6.3 2023 · score 6.4 2024 · score 6.3 2025 · score 5.5 2026 · score 6.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.6 Regional 4.6 State 6.0 Economic 6.5 Supply 7.5 Rent Control 7.6 Eviction 5.2 Tenant 7.7 Housing 7.1 6.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +21.9% (2024)
    4.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.6
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    13.9% poverty · 4.9% unemp.
    6.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,240 average · 38.7% renters
    7.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    32.7% of income on rent
    7.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    5.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.7% renters
    7.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kennewick and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Kennewick compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Benton County
Elevated
#4 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 57th percentileBottomTop
#4 of 8 cities in Benton County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
High
#111 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 83rd percentileBottomTop
#111 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Kennewick risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Kennewick: 6.56.5KennewickThis cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg in countyState: 6.46.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,240/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $8,332-$20,236 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 38.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 85,295 residents, 38.7% rent. 33% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.6 and 4.6 (GOP margin +21.9% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.2, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 7.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.5. Supply constraint: 7.5. The numbers behind those: 13.9% poverty, 4.9% unemployment, 33% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Kennewick sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Pasco, WA · 174d · ~$13.1k all-in ($75/day) · score 8.1 Pasco Richland, WA · 144d · ~$15.5k all-in ($108/day) · score 5.6 Richland Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.3 Spokane Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.4 Tacoma Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.6 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.9 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 7 Everett Spokane Valley, WA · 174d · ~$14.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.4 Spokane Valley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Kennewick
Kennewick · 144d · ~$14.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Kennewick, WA

Landlording in Kennewick, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Kennewick is a city of 85,295 residents where 38.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 32.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,240/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Kennewick eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Kennewick closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Kennewick's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Kennewick runs $8,332 to $20,236 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,240/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.7/10 in Kennewick, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Kennewick: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $20,236 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Kennewick

Trap · 7.6/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Kennewick's 5.5/10 is near the Washington state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 7.6/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I serve the 14-day notice?

If your tenant pays only part of the rent during the 14-day notice period, you generally should not accept it unless you're willing to restart the notice period. Accepting partial payment can waive your right to proceed with the eviction based on that specific notice. It's often safer to decline partial payment and insist on the full amount, or to consult an attorney about how to proceed without waiving your rights.
Q2

Can I charge late fees in Kennewick?

Yes, you can charge late fees in Kennewick, but they must be reasonable and clearly outlined in your lease agreement. Washington law doesn't specify a maximum late fee amount, but courts will generally consider fees excessive if they don't bear a reasonable relationship to the cost incurred by the landlord due to the late payment. Avoid charging exorbitant fees.
Q3

Is rent control coming to Kennewick?

Washington state currently prohibits rent control statewide, but the "rent-control-risk" sub-score of 7.6 indicates that there's an elevated risk of this changing. There are ongoing legislative efforts to repeal the state's rent control preemption. Stay informed on state legislative changes. For now, you can set market rent, but be aware that this could shift. Keep an eye on Washington rent control rules.
Q4

What's the best way to handle a tenant who constantly breaks minor lease rules?

For minor, curable lease violations (like unauthorized pets or noise complaints), you typically need to issue a notice to comply or quit. This notice gives the tenant a specific timeframe (often 10 days for a first violation) to fix the issue. If they don't, you can then proceed with an eviction. For repeated, non-curable violations, a different notice might be appropriate. Always document every violation and notice.
Q5

Can I evict a tenant for an unauthorized occupant?

Yes, if your lease agreement prohibits unauthorized occupants, having someone move in without your permission is a lease violation. You would typically serve a notice to comply or quit, giving the tenant a chance to remove the unauthorized person or add them to the lease (if you approve). If they fail to comply, you can proceed with an eviction based on that lease violation.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.5/10 places Kennewick in the 84th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.