Skip to content
Gold Bar, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,390 residents

Gold Bar, WA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Snohomish County · Population 2,390

In 2026
Risk score
7.1
HIGH

94th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.0 Now7.1
7.1 2.5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.6 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.4 1994 · score 3.4 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.5 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.7 2005 · score 3.7 2006 · score 3.7 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.7 2011 · score 4.7 2012 · score 4.6 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.6 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 5.2 2019 · score 5.3 2020 · score 6.9 2021 · score 7.1 2022 · score 6.9 2023 · score 6.7 2024 · score 6.9 2025 · score 7.1 2026 · score 7.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 6.0 Economic 6.4 Supply 6.3 Rent Control 6.3 Eviction 5.6 Tenant 3.9 Housing 5.7 7.1 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    9.7% poverty · 6.5% unemp.
    6.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,843 average · 9.5% renters
    6.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    43.7% of income on rent
    6.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    169 days filing → judgment
    5.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    9.5% renters
    3.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gold Bar and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Gold Bar compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
Very High
#5 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Very High
#56 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileLowHigh
#56 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Gold Bar risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Gold Bar: 7.17.1Gold BarThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.1
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.1/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 169d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,843/mo. A contested eviction takes 169 days and costs $8,147–$22,177 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 9.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,390 residents, 9.5% rent. 44% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.6, housing court bias 5.7, rent-control risk 6.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.4. Supply constraint: 6.3. The numbers behind those: 9.7% poverty, 6.5% unemployment, 44% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Gold Bar sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.2 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 7.1 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 7 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.7 Redmond Marysville, WA · 170d · ~$12.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 6.9 Marysville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Gold Bar
Gold Bar · 169d · ~$15.2k all-in ($90/day) · score 7.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Gold Bar, WA

Landlording in Gold Bar, Washington, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.1/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Gold Bar is a city of 2,390 residents where 9.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 43.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,843/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Gold Bar eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Gold Bar closes 169 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Gold Bar's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Gold Bar runs $8,147 to $22,177 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 169 days of typical timeline and $1,843/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.9/10 in Gold Bar, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Gold Bar: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $22,177 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Gold Bar

Trap · 20.6 POINTS
Politically, Snohomish County voted Democratic by 20.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 43.7% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Gold Bar for any reason if they're on a month-to-month lease?

No. Washington state law requires "just cause" for all evictions, even for month-to-month tenancies. You cannot simply terminate a tenancy without a valid, legally recognized reason like non-payment, lease violations, or specific owner-occupancy scenarios. This is a critical protection for tenants in Gold Bar.

Q2

What are common mistakes landlords make with security deposits in Washington?

Two big ones: charging more than one month's rent for the deposit, and failing to return the deposit or an itemized statement within 21 days of the tenant moving out. Both can lead to you owing the tenant double the deposit amount plus attorney fees. Document everything about the property's condition.

Q3

How much notice do I have to give for a rent increase in Gold Bar?

Washington state law generally requires a minimum of 60 days' written notice for any rent increase. Always check the latest RCW § 59.18 updates, as rules can change. Be aware that Gold Bar has a rent-control-risk sub-score of 6.3/10, so while there isn't strict rent control now, the legislative environment could shift.

Q4

Can I refuse to rent to someone because their income comes from a government assistance program?

No. Washington is a "source of income" protected state. You cannot discriminate against an applicant solely because their income is from a lawful source, including government assistance, Social Security, or housing vouchers. Treat all sources of verifiable income equally in your screening process.

Q5

When should I get an attorney involved in an eviction case?

As soon as possible, ideally before you even serve the official 14-day notice, but definitely immediately if the tenant doesn't comply with the notice. Given the complexity and cost of evictions in Gold Bar, having an experienced attorney from the outset can save you significant time and money by ensuring all steps are followed correctly. For a deeper dive into costs, see our Washington eviction costs guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.1/10 places Gold Bar in the 94th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.