Skip to content
Mill Creek East, Washington eviction risk overview
Ranked #570 of 1,865 nationally

Mill Creek East, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Snohomish County · Population 25,453

In 2026
Risk score
6.1
ELEVATED

71th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average3.0 Now6.1
10 5 1976 · score 1.3 1977 · score 1.3 1978 · score 1.3 1979 · score 1.4 1980 · score 1.5 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.6 1983 · score 1.5 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.3 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.4 1995 · score 2.4 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.7 2003 · score 2.7 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.9 2006 · score 2.9 2007 · score 3.0 2008 · score 3.5 2009 · score 3.7 2010 · score 3.7 2011 · score 3.8 2012 · score 3.7 2013 · score 3.8 2014 · score 3.9 2015 · score 4.0 2016 · score 4.1 2017 · score 4.2 2018 · score 4.4 2019 · score 4.6 2020 · score 5.3 2021 · score 5.3 2022 · score 5.3 2023 · score 5.4 2024 · score 5.4 2025 · score 4.8 2026 · score 6.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 6.0 Economic 4.1 Supply 7.0 Rent Control 5.5 Eviction 5.8 Tenant 4.1 Housing 4.1 6.1 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    3.7% poverty · 3.9% unemp.
    4.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $3,152 average · 17.4% renters
    7.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.9% of income on rent
    5.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    145 days filing → judgment
    5.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    17.4% renters
    4.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mill Creek East and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Mill Creek East compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
Elevated
#27 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 57th percentileBottomTop
#27 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Elevated
#191 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 70th percentileBottomTop
#191 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Mill Creek East risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Mill Creek East: 6.16.1Mill Creek EastThis cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg in countyState: 6.46.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.1
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 145d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $3,152/mo. A contested eviction takes 145 days and costs $8,863-$19,932 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 17.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 25,453 residents, 17.4% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 3.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.8, housing court bias 4.1, rent-control risk 5.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.1. Supply constraint: 7. The numbers behind those: 3.7% poverty, 3.9% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Mill Creek East sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.4 Tacoma Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 5.6 Bellevue Kent, WA · 173d · ~$15.3k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.9 Kent Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 7 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 8 Renton Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.8 Federal Way Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 5.8 Kirkland Auburn, WA · 170d · ~$13.2k all-in ($77/day) · score 8 Auburn Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 5.7 Redmond Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Mill Creek East
Mill Creek East · 145d · ~$14.4k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Mill Creek East, WA

Landlording in Mill Creek East, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.1/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Mill Creek East is a city of 25,453 residents where 17.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $3,152/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Mill Creek East eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Mill Creek East closes 145 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Mill Creek East's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Mill Creek East runs $8,863 to $19,932 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 145 days of typical timeline and $3,152/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.1/10 in Mill Creek East, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Mill Creek East: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $19,932 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Mill Creek East

Trap · 20.6 POINTS
Politically, Snohomish County voted Democratic by 20.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 27.9% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for being a nuisance in Mill Creek East?

Yes, but it falls under the "just cause" eviction rules. You'll need documented evidence of the nuisance (e.g., police reports, noise complaints, lease violations). A 3-day notice to comply or vacate is typically used for lease violations that can be cured, but for chronic or severe nuisance, you might need a different notice or demonstrate it's an irreparable breach. Consult an attorney.
Q2

Is rent control a concern in Mill Creek East?

Currently, there are no active rent control ordinances in Mill Creek East or statewide in Washington. However, the rent-control-risk sub-score is 5.5/10, indicating a moderate risk. This means there's political pressure and potential for future legislation. Keep an eye on local and state housing policy discussions. Our Washington rent control rules page has more details.
Q3

What if my tenant claims a habitability issue to stop an eviction?

Tenants in Washington can raise habitability defenses. If they claim your property is uninhabitable, they might deposit rent into a court registry. You must be able to prove you've maintained the property. Always respond to repair requests promptly and document all communication and repairs. Ignoring legitimate repair issues can significantly complicate an eviction.
Q4

Can I charge application fees in Mill Creek East?

Yes, you can charge application fees, but they must be reasonable and only cover the actual cost of screening (credit reports, background checks). You cannot use application fees as a profit center. Be transparent about what the fee covers.
Q5

How do I handle a tenant who refuses to move out after the lease ends?

If your lease ends and the tenant remains, they become a "holdover" tenant. In Washington, if you have just cause to terminate the tenancy (which is required even at lease end in many cases), you would follow the unlawful detainer process after proper notice. You cannot simply change locks or remove their belongings. You need a court order for possession.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.1/10 places Mill Creek East in the 71st percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.