Skip to content
Kayak Point, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,883 residents

Kayak Point, WA Eviction Risk: LOW

Snohomish County · Population 1,883

In 2026
Risk score
3.7
LOW

12th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Kayak Point been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min2.3 Average3.1 Now3.7
4.6 2.3
Operator read

Of the 61 cities we track in the county, Kayak Point sits #52, closer to the cautious end of its county cohort than the score alone suggests. The 3.7/10 score has ranged only 2.3 to 4.6 across the 50-year reconstruction, so the environment is stable, not just currently favorable. The one number worth watching is eviction-process difficulty at 6.2/10, since that is the input with the most room to move.

What do renters in Kayak Point earn, and what are they paying?

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Kayak Point score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 6.0 Economic 4.9 Supply 2.8 Rent Control 1.9 Eviction 6.2 Tenant 2.8 Housing 2.9 3.7 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.0% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    6.6% poverty · 4.3% unemp.
    4.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $945 average · 7.8% renters
    2.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.5% of income on rent
    1.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    148 days filing → judgment
    6.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    7.8% renters
    2.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kayak Point and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Kayak Point sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Snohomish County
Very Low
#52 of 61 cities
Rank in county, 15th percentileLowHigh
#52 of 61 cities in Snohomish County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Very Low
#564 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 12th percentileLowHigh
#564 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Kayak Point risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.7Kayak PointThis city5.6Countyavg in county6.1Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Washington landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Washington statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.7
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 148d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $945/mo. A contested eviction takes 148 days and costs $8,885–$22,777 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 7.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,883 residents, 7.8% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (Dem margin +19.0% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.2, housing court bias 2.9, rent-control risk 1.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.2 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 4.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.9. Supply constraint: 2.8. The numbers behind those: 6.6% poverty, 4.3% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Kayak Point sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7 Bellevue Everett, WA · 146d · ~$14.1k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.5 Everett Renton, WA · 170d · ~$14.7k all-in ($86/day) · score 6.6 Renton Bellingham, WA · 164d · ~$14.8k all-in ($90/day) · score 7.3 Bellingham Kirkland, WA · 156d · ~$14.5k all-in ($93/day) · score 6.6 Kirkland Redmond, WA · 147d · ~$14.6k all-in ($99/day) · score 6.6 Redmond Marysville, WA · 170d · ~$12.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 5.9 Marysville Sammamish, WA · 149d · ~$14.5k all-in ($97/day) · score 5.3 Sammamish Shoreline, WA · 174d · ~$14.5k all-in ($83/day) · score 6.4 Shoreline Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Kayak Point
Kayak Point · 148d · ~$15.8k all-in ($107/day) · score 3.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Kayak Point, WA

Landlording in Kayak Point, Washington, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Kayak Point is a city of 1,883 residents where 7.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $945/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Kayak Point eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Kayak Point closes 148 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Kayak Point's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Kayak Point runs $8,885 to $22,777 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 148 days of typical timeline and $945/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.8/10 in Kayak Point, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Kayak Point: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $22,777 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Kayak Point

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
For landlords, the 3.7/10 score is most actionable when combined with Island County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 2.9/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can evict someone in Kayak Point?

Even with a non-payment, the absolute fastest you can realistically complete an eviction in Kayak Point is around 45-60 days if everything goes perfectly and the tenant doesn't fight it. This includes the 14-day notice, court filing, service of summons, default judgment, and sheriff lockout. However, the typical timeline is 148 days. Don't expect "fast" in Washington.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for breaking lease rules other than non-payment?

Yes, but it's more complex. You'll generally need to serve a 10-day notice to comply or vacate for lease violations. If the violation is curable (e.g., unauthorized pet), they get 10 days to fix it. If it's a serious, non-curable violation (e.g., criminal activity), you might be able to go straight to court after the notice. Always consult an attorney; these cases are harder than non-payment.
Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Kayak Point?

Legally, no, you can represent yourself. Practically, yes, absolutely. Washington's eviction laws (RCW § 59.18) are very specific and highly technical. One mistake on a notice or in court paperwork can get your case dismissed, forcing you to start over and lose months of rent. The typical cost range of $8,885, $22,777 includes attorney fees for a reason. Don't risk it for a DIY job. You can start with our Washington eviction risk overview for more context.
Q4

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to a hardship?

Washington state courts often consider tenant hardships. While you are generally entitled to your rent, a judge might grant a payment plan or a short delay in the eviction process, especially if the tenant applies for rental assistance programs. This is another reason the process can be lengthy. It doesn't stop the eviction, but it can slow it down.
Q5

Can I increase rent in Kayak Point?

Yes, but you must provide proper notice. For a month-to-month tenancy, you generally need to give at least 60 days' written notice for a rent increase. There are no statewide rent control laws in Washington, so you're not capped on the amount of increase, but it must be reasonable and not retaliatory. Be mindful of Washington rent control rules as this could change.
Q6

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is final?

Once the court grants you a Writ of Restitution, you must schedule the sheriff to physically remove the tenant. You cannot do this yourself. The sheriff will post a notice and then return on the scheduled date to oversee the lockout. This is the final step in the legal eviction process.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.7/10 places Kayak Point in the 12th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.