Skip to content
Cadott, Wisconsin eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,449 residents

Cadott, WI Eviction Risk: LOW

Chippewa County · Population 1,449

In 2026
Risk score
2.6
LOW

26th percentile, Wisconsin.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.5 Now2.6
3.9 1.8 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.3 1989 · score 2.3 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.4 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.4 1994 · score 2.4 1995 · score 2.1 1996 · score 2.3 1997 · score 2.3 1998 · score 2.3 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.3 2001 · score 2.3 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.3 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.3 2007 · score 2.4 2008 · score 2.9 2009 · score 3.2 2010 · score 3.3 2011 · score 3.2 2012 · score 3.1 2013 · score 3.1 2014 · score 2.9 2015 · score 2.9 2016 · score 2.8 2017 · score 2.7 2018 · score 2.7 2019 · score 2.6 2020 · score 3.7 2021 · score 3.9 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.6 2026 · score 2.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.6 Regional 4.6 State 2.9 Economic 4.7 Supply 5.5 Rent Control 2.6 Eviction 2.4 Tenant 8.1 Housing 4.5 2.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +23.0% (2024)
    4.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.6
  3. State political climate
    Wisconsin legislature & governorship
    2.9
  4. Economic stress
    13.4% poverty · 0.4% unemp.
    4.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $775 average · 33.0% renters
    5.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    25.5% of income on rent
    2.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    51 days filing → judgment
    2.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.0% renters
    8.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cadott and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Cadott compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Chippewa County
Very Low
#10 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 10th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 11 cities in Chippewa County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Wisconsin
Low
#614 of 803 cities
Rank in state, 24th percentileLowHigh
#614 of 803 cities in Wisconsin for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Cadott risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Cadott: 2.62.6CadottThis cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg in countyState: 3.13.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 51d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $775/mo. A contested eviction takes 51 days and costs $2,128–$4,980 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,449 residents, 33.0% rent. 26% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.6 and 4.6 (GOP margin +23.0% (2024)). State climate at 2.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.4, housing court bias 4.5, rent-control risk 2.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.7. Supply constraint: 5.5. The numbers behind those: 13.4% poverty, 0.4% unemployment, 26% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Cadott sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Eau Claire, WI · 47d · ~$3.3k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.9 Eau Claire Milwaukee, WI · 49d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Milwaukee Madison, WI · 45d · ~$3.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.6 Madison Green Bay, WI · 51d · ~$3.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 3 Green Bay Kenosha, WI · 53d · ~$3.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Kenosha Racine, WI · 51d · ~$3.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.6 Racine Appleton, WI · 48d · ~$3.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 2.9 Appleton Waukesha, WI · 54d · ~$3.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Waukesha Oshkosh, WI · 47d · ~$3.5k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.9 Oshkosh Janesville, WI · 46d · ~$3.7k all-in ($80/day) · score 3 Janesville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Cadott
Cadott · 51d · ~$3.6k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Cadott, WI

Landlording in Cadott, Wisconsin, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Cadott is a city of 1,449 residents where 33.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 25.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $775/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Cadott eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Cadott closes 51 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Cadott's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Cadott runs $2,128 to $4,980 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 51 days of typical timeline and $775/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.1/10 in Cadott, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Wisconsin, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Cadott: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Wisconsin's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,980 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Cadott

Trap · 2.6/10
The 4/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Cadott's rent-control-risk sub-score is 2.6/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,980 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.90× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 25,794 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 145,103.

  • 1,980Past month
  • 25,794Past 12 months
  • 0.90×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 15.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least five days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $94.50 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 2,410 filings (1.01× hist)2023-06-01: 2,537 filings (1.03× hist)2023-07-01: 2,536 filings (0.99× hist)2023-08-01: 2,743 filings (1.04× hist)2023-09-01: 2,286 filings (1.07× hist)2023-10-01: 2,552 filings (1.07× hist)2023-11-01: 2,151 filings (1.13× hist)2023-12-01: 2,077 filings (1.16× hist)2024-01-01: 2,545 filings (1.00× hist)2024-02-01: 2,259 filings (1.07× hist)2024-03-01: 2,032 filings (0.97× hist)2024-04-01: 2,340 filings (1.06× hist)2024-05-01: 2,378 filings (0.99× hist)2024-06-01: 2,392 filings (0.97× hist)2024-07-01: 2,589 filings (1.01× hist)2024-08-01: 2,514 filings (0.96× hist)2024-09-01: 1,996 filings (0.93× hist)2024-10-01: 2,235 filings (0.93× hist)2024-11-01: 1,659 filings (0.87× hist)2024-12-01: 1,713 filings (0.95× hist)2025-01-01: 2,112 filings (0.83× hist)2025-02-01: 1,680 filings (0.81× hist)2025-03-01: 1,693 filings (0.81× hist)2025-04-01: 2,086 filings (0.95× hist)2025-05-01: 2,137 filings (0.89× hist)2025-06-01: 2,246 filings (0.91× hist)2025-07-01: 2,504 filings (0.98× hist)2025-08-01: 2,486 filings (0.95× hist)2025-09-01: 2,440 filings (1.14× hist)2025-10-01: 2,083 filings (0.87× hist)2025-11-01: 1,776 filings (0.93× hist)2025-12-01: 1,854 filings (1.03× hist)2026-01-01: 2,385 filings (0.93× hist)2026-02-01: 1,958 filings (0.94× hist)2026-03-01: 1,945 filings (0.93× hist)2026-04-01: 1,980 filings (0.90× hist)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the most common mistake Cadott landlords make during eviction?

The most common mistake is failing to serve proper notice or making errors on the notice itself. Any mistake can lead to the court dismissing your case, forcing you to restart the entire process, costing you more time and money. Always double-check your notices and consider getting legal advice.
Q2

Can I turn off utilities if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings without a court order (Writ of Restitution) is an illegal "self-help eviction" in Wisconsin. This can result in you owing the tenant significant damages and penalties. Always follow the legal eviction process.
Q3

How long does it typically take to get a court date in Chippewa County?

After you file the summons and complaint, a court date is usually set within 2-4 weeks. This can vary based on the court's schedule and caseload, but it's generally a relatively quick turnaround for the initial hearing.
Q4

Is rent control a risk in Cadott?

No, Wisconsin has a statewide preemption against rent control, meaning local municipalities cannot enact their own rent control laws. This significantly reduces your Wisconsin rent control risk, which is reflected in Cadott's low sub-score of 2.6/10 for rent-control-risk.
Q5

Should I accept partial rent payment if a tenant is late?

Generally, it's risky to accept partial payment after serving a 5-day notice for non-payment. Doing so can be seen as waiving your right to evict based on that specific notice, and you might have to issue a new notice and start the clock over. If you decide to accept partial payment, get a clear written agreement that it does not waive your right to proceed with eviction for the remaining balance.
Q6

What if my tenant damages the property during an eviction?

You can deduct the cost of damages beyond normal wear and tear from the security deposit. If the damages exceed the deposit, you can sue the tenant for the additional amount. The eviction judgment itself may include a judgment for damages and unpaid rent. Keep detailed records and photos of the property's condition before and after the tenancy.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.6/10 places Cadott in the 26th percentile of Wisconsin cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.