Within parent city
20
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally
Birmingham Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 01073011904 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 2,058 · 76% of tract blocks fall in Birmingham
Tract 01073011904, home to 2,058 residents in Birmingham in Jefferson County, scores 4.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #70,091 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 14% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 2% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $917 monthly, set against $67,798 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 32% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units803
Renter share31.5%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate16.6%
Median income$67,798
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
61
th percentile
Elevated
National
63
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.5938, -86.7427 · click any tract to drill in
Why Birmingham scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
16.6% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$917 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0
How Birmingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 72%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 47%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 101Total filings over 11 yrs
- 5.15%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.5%Peak (2012)
- 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.4%Housing insecurity
- 15.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.6%Food insecurity
- 24.5%SNAP enrollment
- 14.3%Transit barriers
- 11.0%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 42.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Birmingham
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073011904
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073011904?
Census tract 01073011904 in Birmingham scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073011904?
Median gross rent is $917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 14% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073011904?
16.6% of residents in tract 01073011904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,058.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073011904?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 90th, minority 91th, housing 28th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073011904?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 101 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073011904 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.15% of renter households, peaking at 10.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 01073011904 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 01073011904 compare to Birmingham overall?
Tract 01073011904 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 01073011904 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 47% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
Ensley
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Woodlawn
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
North Birmingham
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
North Birmingham
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Marks Village
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01073013100
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Smithfield
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Fourth Avenue Historic District
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Related
Explore the geography around tract 01073011904
Parent city ↑
Birmingham
2.9 / 10
Parent county ↑
Jefferson County
Parent state ↑
Alabama
Sibling tract →
Tract 01073011804
4.6 / 10
Sibling tract →
Smithfield Historic District
4.5 / 10
Sibling tract →
Cullom Street-Twelfth Street South Historic District
4.5 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts