Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
LaLoma Ranch Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glendale
Tract 04013061046 ·
Maricopa, AZ · pop 6,188 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 04013061046 sits in the LaLoma Ranch area of Glendale eviction risk, AZ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. Population here is 6,188. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%Stable renters 26%Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units2,084
Renter share51.4%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate26.5%
Median income$60,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In LaLoma Ranch
Very High
Within parent city
83th percentile
#11 of 59 tracts In Glendale
High
Within county
84th percentile
#158 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
High
Within state
83th percentile
#306 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glendale and the region
Centroid at 33.5296, -112.3501 · click any tract to drill in
Why LaLoma Ranch scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glendale
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
26.5% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,529 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
3.0
How LaLoma Ranch compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
91%Socioeconomic
53%Household composition
77%Racial/ethnic minority
87%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
400Total filings over 5 yrs
36.20%Avg annual filing rate
44.3%Peak (2005)
121Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2005
Filings climbed 133% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within LaLoma Ranch. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
18.6%Housing insecurity
11.0%Utility-shutoff threat
26.4%Food insecurity
20.6%SNAP enrollment
13.4%Transit barriers
18.8%No health insurance
18.1%Frequent mental distress
34.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in LaLoma Ranch
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. 24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.
Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. Food insecurity runs 26.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 400 filings here across 5 tracked years. Adults with no health insurance runs 18.8% against 11.3% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2005, when 44.3% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 36.2% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #34,278 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 04013061046
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013061046?
Census tract 04013061046 in the LaLoma Ranch neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04013061046?
Median gross rent is $1,529/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04013061046?
26.5% of residents in tract 04013061046 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,188.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04013061046?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 53th, minority 77th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 04013061046 considered part of LaLoma Ranch?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013061046 fall within LaLoma Ranch (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013061046?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 400 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013061046 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 36.20% of renter households, peaking at 44.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 04013061046 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 04013061046 compare to Glendale overall?
Tract 04013061046 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Glendale at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Glendale
Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.