Skip to content
Tucson Estates, Arizona eviction risk overview
City brief · 12,136 residents

Tucson Estates, AZ Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Pima County · Population 12,136

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

36th percentile, Arizona.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average1.9 Now2.4
2.8 1.4 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.8 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 1.9 1998 · score 1.9 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 1.9 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 1.9 2003 · score 1.8 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.5 2008 · score 1.7 2009 · score 2.0 2010 · score 2.0 2011 · score 2.0 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.9 2014 · score 1.9 2015 · score 1.9 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 2.7 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.4 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 2.2 Economic 4.5 Supply 5.0 Rent Control 5.9 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 2.8 Housing 5.0 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +15.2% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Arizona legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    7.3% poverty · 3.0% unemp.
    4.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,248 average · 9.7% renters
    5.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.7% of income on rent
    5.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    9.7% renters
    2.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucson Estates and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Tucson Estates compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pima County
Low
#34 of 49 cities
Rank in county, 31st percentileLowHigh
#34 of 49 cities in Pima County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arizona
Low
#349 of 464 cities
Rank in state, 25th percentileLowHigh
#349 of 464 cities in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Tucson Estates risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Tucson Estates: 2.42.4Tucson EstatesThis cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,248/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $2,032–$4,339 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 9.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 12,136 residents, 9.7% rent. 29% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 7.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +15.2% (2024)). State climate at 2.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 5, rent-control risk 5.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.5. Supply constraint: 5. The numbers behind those: 7.3% poverty, 3.0% unemployment, 29% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Tucson Estates sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Tucson, AZ · 43d · ~$3.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 3.2 Tucson Casas Adobes, AZ · 42d · ~$3.1k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.6 Casas Adobes Marana, AZ · 39d · ~$3.2k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.4 Marana Catalina Foothills, AZ · 36d · ~$3.4k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.3 Catalina Foothills Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Mesa, AZ · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.8 Mesa Gilbert, AZ · 37d · ~$3.6k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.4 Gilbert Chandler, AZ · 40d · ~$3.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.5 Chandler Glendale, AZ · 42d · ~$3.0k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.9 Glendale Scottsdale, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($88/day) · score 2.3 Scottsdale Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tucson Estates
Tucson Estates · 38d · ~$3.2k all-in ($84/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Tucson Estates, AZ

Landlording in Tucson Estates, Arizona, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Tucson Estates is a city of 12,136 residents where 9.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,248/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Tucson Estates eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Tucson Estates closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Tucson Estates's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Tucson Estates runs $2,032 to $4,339 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $1,248/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.8/10 in Tucson Estates, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arizona, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Tucson Estates: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arizona's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,339 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Tucson Estates

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Tucson Estates to neighboring cities in Pima County via the grid below. The 5.3/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under ARLTA ARS 33. Pima County 2020 presidential margin: D+18.7. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Arizona statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant tries to pay after the 5-day notice expires but before I file?

If you haven't filed for eviction yet, you can accept the payment. However, if you've already filed, accepting full payment generally stops the eviction process for non-payment. If you accept a partial payment after filing, it complicates things significantly. Best practice: once you've issued the 5-day notice and it expires, proceed with filing unless the tenant pays in full. Consult your attorney before accepting any money once court action has begun.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for property damage in Tucson Estates?

Yes. If the tenant causes damage beyond normal wear and tear, you can issue a 10-day notice to cure or quit. If they don't fix the damage within 10 days, you can proceed with an eviction filing. For severe, irreparable damage, you might be able to issue an immediate termination notice, but these cases are rare and require strong evidence. Always document the damage with photos and dates.
Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Arizona?

While not legally required, it's highly recommended, especially for your first eviction or if the tenant is disputing the case. An attorney ensures proper notice, correct court filings, and strong representation, saving you time and potential costly mistakes. Given the typical eviction cost range, the attorney's fee is often a worthwhile investment to avoid protracted issues.
Q4

Is there rent control in Tucson Estates or Arizona?

No. Arizona has a statewide ban on rent control. Landlords in Tucson Estates can generally set rent prices as they see fit and raise rent with proper notice (typically 30 days for month-to-month leases) without government caps. For details, see our Arizona rent control rules.
Q5

What if the tenant abandons the property?

If you believe the tenant has abandoned the property (e.g., removed all belongings, stopped paying rent, no response to communication), you must follow specific legal procedures to regain possession and handle their belongings. Simply changing the locks can be an illegal lockout. Arizona law typically requires a 5-day notice of abandonment. Consult an attorney for the exact steps to avoid liability.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places Tucson Estates in the 36th percentile of Arizona cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.