Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
The Foothills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fortuna Foothills
Tract 04027011122 ·
Yuma, AZ · pop 1,602 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
04027011122 is a census tract in the The Foothills area of Fortuna Foothills, AZ. It scores 5/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,602. 67% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%Stable renters 10%Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,027
Renter share39.3%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate22.2%
Median income$28,731
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In The Foothills
Moderate
Within parent city
92th percentile
#2 of 13 tracts In Fortuna Foothills
Very High
Within county
91th percentile
#7 of 67 tracts In Yuma
Very High
Within state
91th percentile
#165 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.6634, -114.4148 · click any tract to drill in
Why The Foothills scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
22.2% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,094 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0
How The Foothills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
92%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
45%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
14.9%Housing insecurity
11.3%Utility-shutoff threat
24.7%Food insecurity
24.7%SNAP enrollment
12.0%Transit barriers
16.9%No health insurance
15.5%Frequent mental distress
47.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in The Foothills
75% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Yuma County average of 40.1%. Set annual rent against average income of $28,731 and the ratio lands at 46%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10. Disability prevalence runs 47.3% against 31.5% nationally.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.2/10. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
It sits 1.2 points above the Yuma County average of 3.8. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.4/10.
SNAP participation runs 24.7% against 15.2% nationally. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 7.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the AZ average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,094, close to the Fortuna Foothills average. 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 04027011122
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011122?
Census tract 04027011122 in the The Foothills neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04027011122?
Median gross rent is $1,094/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011122?
22.2% of residents in tract 04027011122 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,602.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011122?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 61th, minority 47th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 04027011122 considered part of The Foothills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04027011122 fall within The Foothills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 04027011122 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 04027011122 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?
Tract 04027011122 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills
Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.