Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Yuma East Eviction Risk: Lower , Fortuna Foothills

Tract 04027011119 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,723 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 04027011119 covers part of the Yuma East area of Fortuna Foothills, AZ, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,723 residents. Against Yuma County at 40.1%, 12% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score

3.2

Lower

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 12% Owners 86%

Tract context

Occupied units933

Renter share13.5%

SVI overall0.51

Poverty rate8.0%

Median income$54,814

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.6629, -114.4276 · click any tract to drill in

Why Yuma East scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

5.2

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.7

State political climate

Arizona legislature & governorship

2.2

Economic stress

8.0% poverty · this tract

2.0

Supply constraint

tract rent vs county FMR

5.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

8.1

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.4

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

4.2

Housing court bias

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

7.0

How Yuma East compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

59%Socioeconomic
38%Household composition
42%Racial/ethnic minority
49%Housing & transportation

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.5%Housing insecurity
5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
12.4%Food insecurity
9.6%SNAP enrollment
6.4%Transit barriers
12.9%No health insurance
12.4%Frequent mental distress
38.7%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Yuma East

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2/10.

Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10. On the national scale it lands near the 25th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. It tracks the Yuma County average of 3.8 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027011119

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011119?

Census tract 04027011119 in the Yuma East neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011119?

8.0% of residents in tract 04027011119 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,723.

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011119?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 38th, minority 42th, housing 49th.

Is tract 04027011119 considered part of Yuma East?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04027011119 fall within Yuma East (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 04027011119 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 04027011119 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027011119 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.