Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Yuma East Eviction Risk: Lower , Fortuna Foothills

Tract 04027011119 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,723 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 04027011119 (Yuma East in Fortuna Foothills, Arizona) comes in at $1/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 13th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 12% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $54,814 a year. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 12% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units933
Renter share13.5%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$54,814

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Yuma East
Moderate
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#9 of 13 tracts In Fortuna Foothills
Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#57 of 67 tracts In Yuma
Very Low
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#859 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.6629, -114.4276 · click any tract to drill in

Why Yuma East scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0

How Yuma East compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Yuma East risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 011119Fortuna Foothills: 3.03.0Fortuna Foothillsparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Yuma East

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Yuma County average of 4.3 and below the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027011119

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011119?

Census tract 04027011119 in the Yuma East neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011119?

8.0% of residents in tract 04027011119 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,723.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011119?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 38th, minority 42th, housing 49th.
Q4

Is tract 04027011119 considered part of Yuma East?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04027011119 fall within Yuma East (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 04027011119 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 04027011119 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027011119 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related